rvwnsd

Ohdeargod.

 

Yeah, ballet masters must grab their dancers by the pussy in demonstrating how to execute a proper tour jeté .

 

Thank you for pointing out that fuzziness, New York Times.

I wonder how "fuzzy area" slipped by the editors.

Do any escorts here reveal their real name to the client after the session?...

Yes, three escorts that I can think of have told me their real names.

...Consider this, you meet a client who you run the chance of seeing out in public. Wouldn't it be awkward if you're with friends and he said hey .... (insert escort name here) .... rather than your real name. ...

When I've seen and acknowledged an escort out in public I've simply said "Hey," "Hi," or "Hello."

I wonder if clients reveal their real name?

I always use my true first name. Much easier than having to remember a fictitious name.

If you like autumn, come to Phoenix. That's what our "winter" feels like.

Looks very good but (nitpicking) appears older than 24. "Not that there's anything wrong with that."

What we have here is a moderate case of age-shaving.

I dunno - in picture #3 he looks like he is celebrating his 18th or 19th annual 24th birthday. While he looks great, he ain't 24.

The thing that surprises me is how many of the reports include the guy exposing himself to women. Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Louis CK, etc. The unwanted touching, the lewd come-ons, the coercion, all that is terrible. But the dick display seems just weird to me.

...Yeah, you have to be pretty twisted to want to expose it to random women...

I agree with you both. Exposing oneself always struck me as something a mental patient who was released too soon did, not something a celebrity would do.

...But again, there's that sense that they can do anything.

True that. Perhaps they did a good job of hiding mental illness and managed to avoid getting diagnosed and treated.

Most (probably 90% - 95%) of the escorts I hire send a thank you email or text. I also send thank you texts/emails. However, I can see where some escorts could feel uncomfortable initiating the thank you, given that some clients react rather unfavorably when contacted.

He has advertised (and used the same pictures) for years. The face pics were used in his Rentboy ad. I'd proceed with caution.

Apparently, the glitter crisis began a few years ago. https://reporter.rit.edu/distorter/national-glitter-crisis

When I saw the title of the thread I thought it was about the Mariah Carey movie from 2001.

 

~Boomer~

I thought the same as you did until realizing they don't usually ban stuff people don't want.

I truly do not want to know who is next.

I think I’m going to take the plunge and try to see Eric Hassan while he’s here in Dallas next week. This is all based on Forum members feedback and comments. Thanks, gentlemen!

He's a LOT of fun!!!

...Very few people collect eggs in baskets these days. ....

In the years since this thread was started raising chickens has become popular among some urban dwellers. My guess is they collect eggs in some sort of basket.

No this is not exempting a gay person who committed a crime from the death penalty. This is for not giving death penalty for someone who is gay. No crime was committed-save being gay.

 

Basically this provision was targeted for countries where simply being gay is punishable by death. Apparently there are six or so countries where simply being gay is punishable by death.

 

There were some other provisions-minors, blasphemy , pregnant women etc. I didn't know if there was any fine print that made us vote with the usual suspects. Putting someone to death for being gay in this day and age-I mean what if you visit that country for work and they find you are gay and sentence you to death right there?

No this is not exempting a gay person who committed a crime from the death penalty. This is for not giving death penalty for someone who is gay. No crime was committed-save being gay.

 

Basically this provision was targeted for countries where simply being gay is punishable by death. Apparently there are six or so countries where simply being gay is punishable by death.

 

There were some other provisions-minors, blasphemy , pregnant women etc. I didn't know if there was any fine print that made us vote with the usual suspects. Putting someone to death for being gay in this day and age-I mean what if you visit that country for work and they find you are gay and sentence you to death right there?

I'm not sure which I think is more poorly written - the article or the resolution. Although the resolution addresses the use of death as punishment for consensual same-sex relations, blasphemy, and other offenses it does not address the fact that these are considered crimes in the first place. Then again, the article isn't well-written, so we don't know what the resolution actually said. Here is a link to a piece from NBC News regarding the State Department's clarification of the vote on the resolution.

There are three statements in the piece that I found to be particularly interesting:

1. "The United States unequivocally condemns the application of the death penalty for conduct such as homosexuality, blasphemy, adultery, and apostasy. We do not consider such conduct appropriate for criminalization.”
   
2. "...the U.S. voted "no" to the resolution under the Obama administration, though the specific mention of "same-sex relations' was not included in previous death penalty resolutions."
   
3. "Jessica Stern, executive director of OutRight Action International, a global LGBTQ human rights organization, acknowledged the U.S. vote on the U.N. resolution was misconstrued.
    
   "There's been some misreporting and misconceptions," Stern told NBC News. "The U.S. always opposes this death penalty resolution, because it makes reference to a global moratorium on the death penalty. For both Obama and Trump, so long as the death penalty is legal in the U.S., it takes this position."
    
   "OutRight will call out the Trump administration on its many rights violations, its many abuses of power from LGBTI violations to xenophobia, but this particular instance is not an example of a contraction of support on LGBTI rights," Stern continued. "It would be a mistake to interpret its opposition to a death penalty resolution to a change in policy."
   

I understand that Gay Star News is not exactly The New York Times, but it should do a better job of reporting topics like this.

The pics certainly don't match to someone who is 5'7" and 135 lbs.

Although I do not favor the death penalty in general, I also do not favor exempting gay people who have been convicted of a crime that carries the death penalty while not exempting a non-gay person. Two reasons: 1) If a gay person murders someone they should be punished in the same way as a heterosexual person. 2) I can see a convicted murderer "coming out as gay" to avoid the death penalty.

I'd support a resolution banning the criminalization of being gay.

Can you cite a source for this?

Thanks to Google I found the following:

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Woman-Massage-Envy-Worker-Abused-Me-Company-Offered-Free-Spa-Day-446510283.html

http://pix11.com/2017/11/26/massage-envy-facing-sexual-harassment-allegations-from-more-than-180-women/

Massage Envy locations are franchises. It is not clear whether any of the victims contacted the corporate office (not the franchise owner's offices, but Massage Envy's corporate office) when the franchisee's response was unsatisfactory. Regardless, I think the victims were right in calling the police.

I thought that it was bottom 101 doing the fun time before and dinner after. I know some that won't eat all day preparing for it.

Well, to be frank, if I had "digestive issues" yesterday I would not be able to bottom today. We all know that had the escort cancelled and said he was ill the result would be:

I never liked clean shaven. So, that's a plus. You said he he looks close to how he looks in the pics. So he is not the guy in pics? In other words not the Miles of Corbin Fisher?

I read that to mean today he looks close to the way he did when the pictures were taken, i.e. they are probably recent.

Glad I took the chance...he did all he had agreed to and except for no longer being clean shaven is very close to how he looks in the pics in his rent man posting. Was good time.

Thanks for reporting back.

If this has turned into a soul-crushing experience, then I think you should discuss the comment with him. As others have pointed out, he might feel out of place with you and your friends for a number of reasons: you were going to a place that's more expensive or upscale than he is accustomed to, he might feel intimidated by your friends, or who knows what. Regarding his inability to bottom, there are "digestive issues" that could have come into play, his ass might be sore from eating spicy foods or from a previous digestive issue, or he might not have been able to thoroughly clean out despite all his best efforts. All three have happened to me.

I read a handful of article about this topic over the weekend. Having come of age at the beginning of the epidemic and lost many friends, colleagues, and acquaintances to HIV/AIDS as well as to the side-effects of the early medications I think this is wonderful news.

I was also considering looking for some volunteer activity in the community, any suggestions?

The DC Center for the LGBT Community has quite a few volunteer opportunities. On of the more intriguing one is the twice monthly Packing Parties.

Happy Thanksgiving to you, too! I'm glad the holiday is off to a great start.

LOL, they charge you twice as much, then give you $25 off.... And I'm sure that HE aint in that Big Brown Bag ?

LOL