rvwnsd

When judging whether reviews look suspicious or not I use the following criteria: How long have the reviewers been members? If the reviewers are long- or medium-term RM members then I regard them as legitimate. How many reviews has the reviewer posted? How many different guys has the reviewer reviewed? How many reviews does the escort have and over what period of time? In this case, most reviewers are established. I'd say the escort is asking his clients to review him and they oblige. One tactic to gauge the legitimacy of a review/reviewer is to ask the reviewer for feedback. I've done that and have gotten everything from an essay to a one-word answer. The one-word answer guys usually warm up after some back-and-forth. If they don't reply or reply with very little detail, I question the legitimacy. (Not to them, of course) Hope this helps.

Over the years I've seen the term in personal ads and some escort ads used to mean not in the bar and party scene. My first thought upon seeing it in this guy's ad was "You aren't part of the scene but you live in West Hollywood?" However, WeHo is a big place and if I was 22 and moving to a strange city in a foreign country I'd live in the gayborhood, too.

You took the words right out of my keyboard. Kevin Slater is also very witty, funny, and intelligent.

What an escort is willing to do and compatibility, to me, are one in the same. I truly don't care what an escort is willing to do with someone else. Given it is me paying for the session I want to know what he will do with me.

That depends. In general, I would say no because the porn scene is either directed by someone who is not me or is not directed and, rather evolves naturally between the escort and someone who is not me. Either way, neither tells me much about whether the escort and I are compatible.

Given who he was talking to, a Dunkin Donuts gift card might have been the best option.

That isn't a mere tiger. It's Hobbes!!

Congratulations!

His ad popped up in search recently and the headline said something like "I started the Russia Investigation." As of today it says "Pornstar with National Security Secrets." I think I'll pass.

I was thinking the same thing. Plus, it might be a law that was written back in the day when things were written like that.

Am I the only one who noticed the dick pic appears to be of a white guy's dick and nowhere near 10.5"?

His ad now has no text and no public photo.

That or they decided to do the right thing. EDIT: "They" being Grindr.

Yes, Form I-3663-43 is completed, in sextupulet. The original, blue, pink, goldenrod, and buff copies are submitted and the salmon copy is retained for one's own records. Of course not! How can the form be completed in sextupulet if it is online? Not required, but yes, one may be nominated. Similar process, but a U-3663-43 is filed instead of a I-3663-43.

@ArVaGuy, it isn't healthy to hold stuff in. Tell us how you really feel.

All I can say is they better not come out with "Greg and Frank."

Someone has been watching too many infomercials.

But seriously, if you like your current headphones get a new charger.

So we have THREE conditions: Ad hidden Ad disappears from your buddy list Listing of ads in the advertiser's "current (formerly "home") city displayed when clicking on link [*]Ad inactive Ad remains in your buddy list Ad is displayed when clicking on the link [*]Advertiser changes his name or deletes the ad Ad remains in your buddy list, albeit with the new name and URL "404" page is displayed when clicking on a link to the old URL Feels like we need a process map and a work-breakdown structure.

No, that's a different guy. "Alex" keeps getting younger and younger. I believe he states his age at 28 now. When he started advertising several (like eight or ten) years ago he stated his age as late 30's, if memory serves.

Yep! Inactive ads (the ones that are not hidden) remain in your buddy list.

Take me at my word - I am not being facetious when asking this: Why don't you ask Tracfone these questions?