LookingAround

For me it’s not one or the other.  You either have good judgement or you don’t.  With all of the info given with his side hustles and social media posting, he’s shown he does not have good judgment which is something we expect as a standard for our judicial officers. 

And now you're going to have to get more therapy after this Pops incident?

No questions, just took my entry money, gave me a hanger and check tag and off to the races...

Please see the following topic, especially my last reply when I locked it.
The provider likes to come to this website and register a bunch of accounts pretending to be members (to the point where he creates hundreds of random posts in other forums to try and mask what he's doing) as a way to promote and defend himself.   Given how he has interacted with me and how he's treated this site, we do not recommend this provider in any way and will simply be locking any future topics about him.

To circle back on this...  
StarGZ has magically made his way back to spam more than 100 people via PM with a plea of innocence.   This heartfelt plea of someone who is not the provider and not in any way related to @pdxrick also just happens to only refer to me as "Radiobob".   This matches other behavior where the provider created nearly a dozen accounts and flooded the site with short 1-2 word replies in an effort to make it appear they were not only defending the provider.  (Anyone remember the Deli having literally 3 pages of replies each with just a couple of words?) I've never done this before, but I recommend our members not hire or interact with this provider in any way.  
He clearly has issues with telling the truth and potentially other mental health issues as well. (Note: I'm not a doctor and I'm not qualified to diagnose issues.  This is simply my own personal observation from interactions with the provider across over a dozen accounts.)
Going forward, any further topics around this provider will automatically be locked with a reply directing people back to this thread.  This site will not be used to create a false narrative using fake accounts to promote/defend a provider.  

As a consumer I find these posts and comments so strange. Usually when guys find a gem they keep it to themselves for fear of the guy being overwhelmed and prices going up and hence less available. This fan club cheering is so strange and almost makes me want to avoid him. 

Nobody has answered his question though. 
I love it if a guy can cum multiple times. I once edged a guy who came seven times in like an hour or an hour and a half. Not kidding not exaggerating. Never seen anything like it—before or since. It was so hot. 

Nobody has answered his question though. 
I love it if a guy can cum multiple times. I once edged a guy who came seven times in like an hour or an hour and a half. Not kidding not exaggerating. Never seen anything like it—before or since. It was so hot. 

“There were good people on both sides.”  We get it now. Riiiight. 

I'm not saying that bottoms cannot enjoy looking at, touching, or rimming a hot ass, but I'm amused that whenever Rafael Alencar is discussed the topic typically drifts to whether he's had butt implants.  As a nearly-100% bottom, I can tell you that I don't care whether his ass is due to exercise or surgical enhancement.  It's the rest of him that catches my interest -- the handsome face, the nice torso, the big dick, his ability to pound a bottom, and his seemingly "chill" attitude while still being dominant in bed. 

Many will meet with fans for pay and do not advertise on RM. Their advertising (“”) is only via OF. 

He’s not like a taxi.  No. 

The term used in the post wasn’t “undocumented.” It was “illegals.”
Btw I don’t know but it probably escaped the awareness of that poster that he, himself, is an “illegal” (to borrow his term) by virtue of his hiring. 😂😂😂

The term used in the post wasn’t “undocumented.” It was “illegals.”
Btw I don’t know but it probably escaped the awareness of that poster that he, himself, is an “illegal” (to borrow his term) by virtue of his hiring. 😂😂😂

He’s not like a taxi.  No. 

The term used in the post wasn’t “undocumented.” It was “illegals.”
Btw I don’t know but it probably escaped the awareness of that poster that he, himself, is an “illegal” (to borrow his term) by virtue of his hiring. 😂😂😂

The term used in the post wasn’t “undocumented.” It was “illegals.”
Btw I don’t know but it probably escaped the awareness of that poster that he, himself, is an “illegal” (to borrow his term) by virtue of his hiring. 😂😂😂

“There were good people on both sides.”  We get it now. Riiiight. 

The whole discussion around allegations that the provider is “illegal” is off track. Can we please get back to the extortion discussion? 🤔

“There were good people on both sides.”  We get it now. Riiiight. 

“There were good people on both sides.”  We get it now. Riiiight. 

“There were good people on both sides.”  We get it now. Riiiight. 

You shop at Macy's????

Misinformation. It’s more than 97% effective — it’s about 99% effective. And I for one am completely adherent to the dosing schedule so don’t say almost no one is. You’re wrong in both your comments. 

The numbers you cite are wrong. The data indicate that prep is 99% effective. You are making up your own numbers and you cannot cite authoritative sources because there are none. You are left to make it up and rely on BtmBearDad as your source. 
 
I rest my case.