ApexNomad

As a New Yorker, I can say we value convenience and are usually open to traveling a bit for the right experience, especially if it means better rates or accommodations. But honestly, it really depends on the client. Some will do a short drive or subway ride, while others want to stay within the city limits for ease.
That said, I don’t think anyone in the boroughs is gonna trek out to Long Island unless they already live there! Areas in New Jersey (especially those accessible by PATH) could definitely attract clients looking for something a bit different.
If a client wants to see you, they’ll see you and make it happen.
Best of luck to you!!

It's what Green does best. It's expected of him. 

As a New Yorker, I can say we value convenience and are usually open to traveling a bit for the right experience, especially if it means better rates or accommodations. But honestly, it really depends on the client. Some will do a short drive or subway ride, while others want to stay within the city limits for ease.
That said, I don’t think anyone in the boroughs is gonna trek out to Long Island unless they already live there! Areas in New Jersey (especially those accessible by PATH) could definitely attract clients looking for something a bit different.
If a client wants to see you, they’ll see you and make it happen.
Best of luck to you!!

As a New Yorker, I can say we value convenience and are usually open to traveling a bit for the right experience, especially if it means better rates or accommodations. But honestly, it really depends on the client. Some will do a short drive or subway ride, while others want to stay within the city limits for ease.
That said, I don’t think anyone in the boroughs is gonna trek out to Long Island unless they already live there! Areas in New Jersey (especially those accessible by PATH) could definitely attract clients looking for something a bit different.
If a client wants to see you, they’ll see you and make it happen.
Best of luck to you!!

As a New Yorker, I can say we value convenience and are usually open to traveling a bit for the right experience, especially if it means better rates or accommodations. But honestly, it really depends on the client. Some will do a short drive or subway ride, while others want to stay within the city limits for ease.
That said, I don’t think anyone in the boroughs is gonna trek out to Long Island unless they already live there! Areas in New Jersey (especially those accessible by PATH) could definitely attract clients looking for something a bit different.
If a client wants to see you, they’ll see you and make it happen.
Best of luck to you!!

As a New Yorker, I can say we value convenience and are usually open to traveling a bit for the right experience, especially if it means better rates or accommodations. But honestly, it really depends on the client. Some will do a short drive or subway ride, while others want to stay within the city limits for ease.
That said, I don’t think anyone in the boroughs is gonna trek out to Long Island unless they already live there! Areas in New Jersey (especially those accessible by PATH) could definitely attract clients looking for something a bit different.
If a client wants to see you, they’ll see you and make it happen.
Best of luck to you!!

Did "society" fail them ? We used to have institutions to help...but circumstances surrounding their rights of self-detemination took precedence, and here we are with civil rights intact and more people on the street because of it.

I’m pretty sure if you talk to a homeless person, the first thing on their mind isn’t “down with them gays”—it’s more likely “I wish I wasn’t homeless.” The real issue here is society failing the disenfranchised as a whole, including the LGBTQ+ community.

And when I want them to stay, I also pay.

Read the article posted by @azdr0710. It's another example of private equity firms going in, raping the shit out of a company and leaving it for dead. These people have no ethics and don't give a damn about the hundreds of employees they leave in the dust and the thousands of loyal customers they disappoint when they destroy a company with predatory financial schemes.

I hate to say it, but many gays take advantage of the homeless, historically and currently.
If you ever talk to homeless people, ask them how they feel about the LGBT community. You will likely not get a good answer.
In LA (and hopefully most other cities), the cops know the story. An older gay man calls because some homeless kid is causing trouble and won't leave. The old man always says he was just trying to "help the kid out," and the cop always writes it up as a domestic.

And when I want them to stay, I also pay.

Well if you're a "perfect" gay...then you're probably not paying for sex.
He has a right to pick and choose who he wants to fuck. He's not running a soup kitchen or a hospital. He can turn away everyone he wants until he finds a client who meets his standards.

And when I want them to stay, I also pay.

And when I want them to stay, I also pay.

And when I want them to stay, I also pay.

It's the first new show of the season to be renewed for season two.

I feel like this is a common theme on here, and it might be a misunderstanding of how this business works... as others have pointed out before, you don't pay an escort to show up, you pay them to leave. That is a good start to understanding why people who don't have to pay for sex might choose to pay for sex. If you talk to providers, you'll know that they occasionally even hire each other, and they're the very definition of someone who doesn't have to pay for sex.

https://rentmen.eu/SEBASTIANALVAREZ
Has anyone seen Sebastian? He's younger that I usually prefer, but his dick is exceptional (pun intended)!

I’m more hesitant if they’re “straight.” 

Can't believe this thread has gone on for so long. 
Plain and simple, if you're a rich perfect gay then he might be a match. For us mere mortals, don't waste your time. 

I'm hesitant to in some situations but if the reviews are good I'd take the plunge.  One of my favourite providers is bi.