jeezifonly Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 I’m really trying to give this show a fair shot, because I love all of the female actors in it. 3eps in and I may bail if the writing hasn’t improved in 4… Period-wise, it’s frustrating to watch if you were actually an observer in 1969… Anybody loving it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaltonJ Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 I’m on episode 5. It’s a slow burn for sure. It has its moments, but loses its focus at times. The biggest waste of talent so far is Carol Burnett - this is a woman who’s won 6 Emmys, but has been relegated for the most part to the confines of a bed with her mouth open and unable to speak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manhattan Posted July 3 Share Posted July 3 Kristin Wiig doesn’t have the ability to pull off a lead in a series. She’s very talented and funny, but an actress she isn’t. There’s lots of wasted talent in a very thin story. Maybe it’s supposed to be camp? It is very stylish, but it’s far from engaging. Stay in your lane, Ms. Wiig. We need big funny movies, not vanity projects that use CGI to enhance everyone’s dusty, saggy, jawlines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadlift1 Posted July 3 Share Posted July 3 So much potential. I'm glad I dropped it after episode 2. I'll watch season 2 Tokyo vice instead. thomas 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scrtlovr Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 I thought it was deliciously trashy and silly - guilty pleasure - like watching reality tv or listening to ABBA 😎. + BenjaminNicholas 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now