dutchal Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 (edited) Here is some more to the story. SIAP. https://wehotimes.com/austin-wolf-filmed-sex-acts-in-john-reed-weho-gym-before-arrest-for-distributing-child-pornography/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13582885/austin-wolf-porn-star-message-partner-court-child-sex-abuse-charges.html The Daily Mail story will leave you a bit shaken. Edited July 1 by dutchal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maninsoma Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 (edited) 25 minutes ago, dutchal said: Here is some more to the story. SIAP. https://wehotimes.com/austin-wolf-filmed-sex-acts-in-john-reed-weho-gym-before-arrest-for-distributing-child-pornography/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13582885/austin-wolf-porn-star-message-partner-court-child-sex-abuse-charges.html The Daily Mail story will leave you a bit shaken. I'm not sure why you wrote that the Daily Mail story would leave readers shaken. It contains no new information other than than Wolf was not released to home confinement. I'm not shaken by that; it seems like the right decision for someone with these allegations against him. Note: I removed the second link you provided because we were asked not to share Wolf's legal name on this site and that link clearly indicates his real name. Edited July 1 by maninsoma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luv2play Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 25 minutes ago, maninsoma said: I'm not sure why you wrote that the Daily Mail story would leave readers shaken. It contains no new information other than than Wolf was not released to home confinement. I'm not shaken by that; it seems like the right decision for someone with these allegations against him. Note: I removed the second link you provided because we were asked not to share Wolf's legal name on this site and that link clearly indicates his real name. Normally we don’t share the legal names of providers on this site but in this case the story is about a porn actor that is in the national press. Like any actor that uses a stage name, the press is using his real name in relation to the news stories they are publishing. I f see one see any reason we can’t use his real band here but obviously I won’t unless the moderators weigh in and say it’s ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchal Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 31 minutes ago, maninsoma said: I'm not sure why you wrote that the Daily Mail story would leave readers shaken. It contains no new information other than than Wolf was not released to home confinement. I'm not shaken by that; it seems like the right decision for someone with these allegations against him. Note: I removed the second link you provided because we were asked not to share Wolf's legal name on this site and that link clearly indicates his real name. What should leave you shaken is what his attorney had to say about what might happen to him. Even giving some credit to an attorney's argument as hyperbole, the facility to which he was sent is physically dangerous. What he's accused of is disgusting in the extreme, and they certainly seem to have the goods on him, he nonetheless remains innocent until proven guilty, and this is not a capital offense. Thanks for the other. I didn't notice his name was in the headline. + José Soplanucas and pubic_assistance 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maninsoma Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 4 minutes ago, dutchal said: What should leave you shaken is what his attorney had to say about what might happen to him. Even giving some credit to an attorney's argument as hyperbole, the facility to which he was sent is physically dangerous. What he's accused of is disgusting in the extreme, and they certainly seem to have the goods on him, he nonetheless remains innocent until proven guilty, and this is not a capital offense. Thanks for the other. I didn't notice his name was in the headline. The entire reason some people are held pending trial is that they are deemed a serious threat if they were to remain free. It seems like prosecutors argued and the judge agreed that there's reason to believe Wolf would continue to be a risk to children through his online behavior if he were in home confinement. That isn't an unreasonable position to hold. While I don't think anyone deserves to be assaulted or murdered in prison, I wouldn't argue that Wolf deserves special treatment so he entirely avoids this risk. What should be true is that everyone being held pending trial is physically safe, and if they remain incarcerated following conviction then they should still be physically safe. pubic_assistance 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvwnsd Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Moderator's Note: Thanks everyone for reading and following the moderator's note posted on Friday. There seems to be some confusion about what we can and can't post. Here's a refresher: CAN'T include the given name (first and last, first only, or last only) of Austin Wolf, his partner, and/or any named victims in the body of a post or reply to a post. CAN include a link to a news story or other artifact that include his given name. If the link itself contains his given name, use the link icon and when given the option to include text, enter something like "link to story" or some such, as below: And one last thing: When you disagree with another member's viewpoint, comment about the viewpoint and not the person. Thanks MikeBiDude, Luv2play, LookingAround and 5 others 3 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ Coolwave35 Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 1 hour ago, rvwnsd said: Moderator's Note: Thanks everyone for reading and following the moderator's note posted on Friday. There seems to be some confusion about what we can and can't post. Thanks Come on, you can say it. You’re shocked we’re behaving and proud of us right???? Openmindedlatino, Luv2play, + KensingtonHomo and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ KensingtonHomo Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 2 hours ago, dutchal said: What should leave you shaken is what his attorney had to say about what might happen to him. Even giving some credit to an attorney's argument as hyperbole, the facility to which he was sent is physically dangerous. What he's accused of is disgusting in the extreme, and they certainly seem to have the goods on him, he nonetheless remains innocent until proven guilty, and this is not a capital offense. He was remanded to the Brooklyn House of Detention, which is no more dangerous than any other jail. It's definitely safer than Rikers. He may be put in solitary because of the additional risk of violence that pedophiles can face, but - otherwise - he's being treated as fairly as any other person facing these charges. LookingAround 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luv2play Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 I understand a complaint has been sworn out about his actions in relation to possessing and distributing child pornography. Has he actually been arraigned in court to face the charges? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloKyle Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 35 minutes ago, Luv2play said: I understand a complaint has been sworn out about his actions in relation to possessing and distributing child pornography. Has he actually been arraigned in court to face the charges? Yes that's what the hearing Friday was. He was read his charges, the judge or his attorney put in a not guilty plea and then the judge decided for no bail and remanded him into custody. Luv2play 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ BOZO T CLOWN Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Austin Wolf will remain confined in MDC until his next court date on July 29th. Bozo will try to attend the hearing. With all of the violence at MDC, Mr. Wolf will be fine. That is the same facility where El Chapo was held, and El Chapo's stay there was without incident, and he is half the size of Wolf. BTC Luv2play and pubic_assistance 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LookingAround Posted July 1 Author Share Posted July 1 26 minutes ago, BOZO T CLOWN said: Austin Wolf will remain confined in MDC until his next court date on July 29th. Bozo will try to attend the hearing. With all of the violence at MDC, Mr. Wolf will be fine. That is the same facility where El Chapo was held, and El Chapo's stay there was without incident, and he is half the size of Wolf. BTC Brooklyn MDC is a federal facility and it's far better than state and county facilities. I've been there many times in my work. Totally fine. That said as a pedophile he's at risk in any facility. + KensingtonHomo, Johnrom, pubic_assistance and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luv2play Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Now that he’s in jail, what happens to his online sites that have thousands of followers? Do they go radio silent? I can’t check since I don’t subscribe to any of those social media sites. JeffsterLA 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ BOZO T CLOWN Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 22 minutes ago, LookingAround said: Brooklyn MDC is a federal facility and it's far better than state and county facilities. I've been there many times in my work. Totally fine. That said as a pedophile he's at risk in any facility. Nobody will be confusing MDC with a Holiday Inn any time soon. NYC, state officials call for urgent action at ‘nightmare’ Brooklyn jail - Gothamist GOTHAMIST.COM The calls come after a scathing ruling by a federal judge who refused to send a defendant there. Exclusive: Inmates decry conditions inside Brooklyn jail NY1.COM A detainee was killed at a Brooklyn jail. NY1 has an exclusive look inside, with interviews with some of the people behind bars. BTC pubic_assistance 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trick Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 If his given name is on the news, why can’t we mention it here? Anthony 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
56harrisond Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 22 minutes ago, Trick said: If his given name is on the news, why can’t we mention it here? thomas, pubic_assistance, + BenjaminNicholas and 2 others 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trick Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 3 minutes ago, 56harrisond said: I wanted to know the reason behind the rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ Coolwave35 Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Trick said: I wanted to know the reason behind the rule. We’re not really allowed to do that here in this forum publicly. There is a separate forum you’re allowed to ask why in. Edited July 2 by Coolwave35 pubic_assistance and Becket 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trick Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Coolwave35 said: We’re not really allowed to do that here in this forum publicly. There is a separate forum you’re allowed to ask why in. Understood. Thank you Edited July 2 by Trick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
top_guy_atl Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 Thank you, moderators for keeping us from going too far off the rails. Your work is appreciated. + DERRIK and + Pensant 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monarchy79 Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 (edited) On 6/29/2024 at 11:15 PM, KensingtonHomo said: That guy does not look like a child. He has hair over his entire body and facial hair. He also has his own OnlyFans. Honestly, you’ve posted about this provider- whom I’ve met and I am most certainly not a twink - a couple of times and it feels personal. The video you are probably watching (I won’t take the risk of looking at that link) isn’t an actual child, nor is it the Porn that the feds have found in Austin Wolf’s files. What the feds probably found were personal files from his computers )that aren’t on general porn of fan sites, and have been streamed from the dark web. You’d probably never be able to see what’s being described here unless you were an actual child porn pervert too. Edited July 2 by Monarchy79 pubic_assistance 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pubic_assistance Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 On 6/30/2024 at 6:20 PM, TooSchoolForCool said: The causes of pedophilia are not well known. One such cause that IS known is the "passing of the torch". Many people guilty of pedophilia have a personal history of sexual abuse as a child. I have a childhood friend who's life was destroyed when he got caught with kiddie porn. (Young teens / not toddlers) Spent a week in jail and made a plea bargain to avoid extensive jail time. Etc etc. Wife divorced him and one of his children never spoke to him again. He reached out to me recently, hoping I would be a sympathetic ear. I respect that he never acted on his impulses. His indulgence was in underage pornography. I inquired as to whether he ever felt remorse for the teens who were being exploited in the films. His answer was complex but overall he admitted to years of sexual abuse when he was 10 years old, by the neighborhood high school boys who basically used him as a cum rag, over and over for years. Rather than view this as abuse, his memory was how it made him feel "loved" and "valued" by all these guys whom he admired and respected. It's a complicated and unfortunate psychology with many layers to it. But the only way to limit the exploitation is to make the punishments extreme. So "Austin" will likely he used as an example due to his celebrity. + Vegas_Millennial, Becket, + Pensant and 2 others 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soloyo215 Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 20 hours ago, maninsoma said: I won't go into much detail because I took this class several years ago and cannot say that I have all of the details memorized, but I attended a training from a psychologist with decades of experience in research and treatment of child sex perpetrators and the most surprising thing she said was this: A large percentage of men experience sexual arousal when shown sexually suggestive images of children. She basically said the difference between the men she treated and those she didn't was not the physiological impulse but rather the control of those impulses. Still, adults are ACCOUNTABLE for their actions. That's the point of the law, to hold adults accountable for their actions, not excuse it by some psychobabble. pubic_assistance 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaronArtz Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 12 hours ago, LookingAround said: Brooklyn MDC is a federal facility and it's far better than state and county facilities. I've been there many times in my work. Totally fine. That said as a pedophile he's at risk in any facility. Is that where Jeffrey Epstein was held? We all know what happened to him ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monarchy79 Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 1 hour ago, soloyo215 said: Still, adults are ACCOUNTABLE for their actions. Really? LOL…. Most adults do everything in their power to avoid accountability…. pubic_assistance 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts