Aedo Posted July 30 Share Posted July 30 4 hours ago, BenjaminNicholas said: They don't want you. They want us.... Especially in an election year. They want your cock, Ben. That’s what they want. + DrownedBoy, wanderlust307, + BenjaminNicholas and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Chuck Posted July 30 Share Posted July 30 I am just guessing. But I’ll bet that you are far more at risk if you hire someone who advertises as 18-21 years old than if you hire somebody older than that. ericwinters 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanderlust307 Posted July 30 Share Posted July 30 6 minutes ago, Just Chuck said: I am just guessing. But I’ll bet that you are far more at risk if you hire someone who advertises as 18-21 years old than if you hire somebody older than that. Why? MikeBiDude 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maninsoma Posted July 30 Share Posted July 30 58 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said: Why? I didn't post what you are questioning, but I think the argument is that law enforcement is much more focused on attempting to help people who are being commercially sexually exploited and people who do sex work at a younger age are more likely to be doing so under the control of someone else. Medin, Just Chuck, Johnrom and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Chuck Posted July 30 Share Posted July 30 (edited) 3 minutes ago, maninsoma said: I didn't post what you are questioning, but I think the argument is that law enforcement is much more focused on attempting to help people who are being commercially sexually exploited and people who do sex work at a younger age are more likely to be doing so under the control of someone else. Exactly. And you might mistakenly actually hire someone under legal age of consent. Edited July 30 by Just Chuck BonVivant 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanderlust307 Posted July 30 Share Posted July 30 53 minutes ago, maninsoma said: I didn't post what you are questioning, but I think the argument is that law enforcement is much more focused on attempting to help people who are being commercially sexually exploited and people who do sex work at a younger age are more likely to be doing so under the control of someone else. Thank you. This is all new to me. Having to watch out for the police... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Chuck Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 On 7/30/2024 at 6:35 AM, Just Chuck said: Exactly. And you might mistakenly actually hire someone under legal age of consent. If you hire a trafficked person or a minor, then you deserve to face justice. You can learn something about the priorities and line-of-thought of vice officers by watching the PBS Documentary: "Sex Trafficking in America". + azdr0710 and Johnrom 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeThomas Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/14-arrested-comic-con-anti-human-trafficking-sting-san-diego-rcna164638 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanderlust307 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 4 minutes ago, MikeThomas said: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/14-arrested-comic-con-anti-human-trafficking-sting-san-diego-rcna164638 So they name the escorts potential victims of trafficking? 🤮 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maninsoma Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 57 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said: So they name the escorts potential victims of trafficking? 🤮 Maybe I missed it...I didn't see anyone's names in terms of those arrested or those believed to be victims of trafficking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ FrankR Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 Human trafficking does happen. We often read about it - every few years we hear about a diplomat or a rich family that abuse and basically hold hostage a domestic helper. Happened here in NYC not too long ago and also in other locations. https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20240621-uk-s-richest-family-get-jail-terms-for-exploiting-staff-at-swiss-villa That said: I think we all know that law enforcement has a way of exaggerating and can rarely be taken by their literal word. Which is disappointing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeThomas Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 1 hour ago, maninsoma said: Maybe I missed it...I didn't see anyone's names in terms of those arrested or those believed to be victims of trafficking. NBC probably has a policy of not providing names. I would think the names of the adults could be easily found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ DrownedBoy Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 8 hours ago, FrankR said: That said: I think we all know that law enforcement has a way of exaggerating and can rarely be taken by their literal word. Which is disappointing. Exactly. You'll note in the above articles that they call it "sex trafficking" when it was simply a trap for Johns. It's just a new term they made up, and they now use it everywhere. Americans are smart enough to realize "prostitution" should be legal, so LA use a new term that sounds worst. So they can continue collecting our tax dollars for victimless crimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now