robberbaron4u Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 https://rentmen.eu/EvinAlexsander Harryinny 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ azdr0710 Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 Just because it's you, RB4U....... https://rent.men/EvinAlexsander marylander1940, robberbaron4u and Harryinny 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShortCutie7 Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 Hot!!! Are the five stars just based on his profile or from meeting him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonnychgo Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 He needs an OF or JFF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanderlust307 Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 He is fat and not good looking. Walt, marylander1940 and Emir 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robberbaron4u Posted August 22 Author Share Posted August 22 30 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said: He is fat and not good looking. He is very "cheeky", figuratively and, in his physical presentation, literally. With particular regard to your remark, I would define him as a "wholesome hunk". In my opinion, of course; please toss no sticks or stones my way. marylander1940 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtlTopGuy Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 46 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said: He is fat and not good looking. Wow.....its one thing to say "He is not my type" or "Not my cup of tea" but to be downright nasty (and yes that is how I view your comment) is just rude. I really thought this was a place to share in a community manner. Guess not everyone subscribes to that philosophy. + keroscenefire, Walt, big-n-tall and 10 others 3 1 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robberbaron4u Posted August 22 Author Share Posted August 22 (edited) On the other hand, the situation could be one of a "fat and not good looking" man paying a compliment to a man he perceives, through a jaundiced eye, to be comparable to him in his physical presentation. Edited August 22 by robberbaron4u marylander1940 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topunderachiever Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 1 hour ago, wanderlust307 said: He is fat and not good looking. Stop doing this. It's a disgusting habit of yours. + JamesB, + azdr0710, + FrankR and 6 others 3 1 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 1 hour ago, wanderlust307 said: He is fat and not good looking. Are you in third grade? It's one thing if he "is not your type," but it's no reason to insult someone. + JamesB, J. S. and MikeBiDude 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanderlust307 Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly. And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robberbaron4u Posted August 22 Author Share Posted August 22 5 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said: What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly. And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average. Down, Fido! Having inspected him "close up" in person, my determination is that he presents, physically and in his manner, very nicely. Walt, AtlTopGuy, + azdr0710 and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marylander1940 Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 (edited) 1 hour ago, wanderlust307 said: He is fat and not good looking. He has a beefy ass with a pink butthole and most tops find that attractive! FAT?! Get some windex! Edited August 22 by marylander1940 Your Man in Arlington 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caramelsub Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 4 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said: What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly. And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average. I think he is hot. He has a beautiful ass. Beauty/sexiness is subjective. There are plenty of guys that people on this site rave about, that are not my type. But this guy is definitely not one of them. I wouldn’t hire him because he appears to be on the sub/bottom side, so we probably would clash. J. S., MikeBiDude and marylander1940 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marylander1940 Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 13 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said: What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly. And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average. Ugly is in the eyes of the beholder. I guarantee you he can get laid on Grindr easily! J. S. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bokomaru Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 23 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said: What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly. There’s something ugly on this thread, but it’s not the provider. J. S., + FrankR, Asterisk and 9 others 3 2 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myophile Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 1 hour ago, wanderlust307 said: What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly. And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average. Huh. Poor baby, did he block you? Make fun of your equipment? Overcharge you? Tell mama how he hurt you! Asterisk, + nycman, + azdr0710 and 4 others 2 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanderlust307 Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 (edited) 14 minutes ago, myophile said: Huh. Poor baby, did he block you? Make fun of your equipment? Overcharge you? Tell mama how he hurt you! Vom vom vom 🤮 Edited August 22 by wanderlust307 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myophile Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 1 hour ago, wanderlust307 said: And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average. …and sorry, but that is a LAUGHABLY ignorant statement. The kid has some serious muscle under that modest padding, which accounts for his ca. 200 lb. weight, at about 5’10” tall. Your “rule of thumb,” aka BMI (body mass index) is a bullshit measurement when applied to any male with significant muscle mass, because the overly simplistic formula does not distinguish fat, which is less dense/heavy relative to size, from muscle, which is far more dense/heavy relative to size. Were he not muscular, his stats would indicate obesity; but he IS muscular, so his BMI means nothing. J. S., Asterisk and + sam.fitzpatrick 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanderlust307 Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 Sure. This is what all fatties say 🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myophile Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 2 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said: Sure. This is what all fatties say 🤣 Go right ahead, bro — marshal your facts, and prove me wrong. Asterisk and J. S. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robberbaron4u Posted August 22 Author Share Posted August 22 6 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said: Sure. This is what all fatties say 🤣 Hmmm...does "takes one to know one" apply to this particular post? myophile 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myophile Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 2 minutes ago, robberbaron4u said: Hmmm...does "takes one to know one" apply to this particular post? Seems likely, doesn’t it? Asterisk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanderlust307 Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 1 minute ago, robberbaron4u said: Hmmm...does "takes one to know one" apply to this particular post? You said that already once. To satisfy your curiosity my stats are 183, 74. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myophile Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 1 minute ago, wanderlust307 said: You said that already once. To satisfy your curiosity my stats are 183, 74. Ah. The technical term for that body type is “skinny-fat.” My sympathies! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts