Jump to content

Do not hire LATINSTUDCAMILO


pupiggy

Recommended Posts

He's not a top at all. He couldn't get hard and then started bottoming when I invited my friend, a top, to come over. He then basically hogged him and then when I left a bad review, he lied and said we never met. RM mods asked me for screenshots, which I produced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold the ripping on the new guy.   Were talking about a name changer here and this escort is a complete scam.  I dont know where he got his reviews but he ranks up there as one of the worst in all my years of hiring.  See the link to my experience.  

Note the dates on his reviews before my 2 star review under my RM name Comets.  Very few and old. Then he magically gets many  5 star reviews within one week of my 2 star.  I call BS.

 

Edited by Yukon21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provider had issue topping; happens to guys.

Provider suggests client invite top friend over.

Client agrees to invite top over.

Provider spends rest of time . . . bottoming for top that client invited over.

If only there was a way a cliemt could avoid this? 🤔 Like saying "If you can't, good night. I'm not paying if agreed svcs not provided. Have a great night!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DFdub said:

Provider had issue topping; happens to guys.

Provider suggests client invite top friend over.

Client agrees to invite top over.

Provider spends rest of time . . . bottoming for top that client invited over.

If only there was a way a cliemt could avoid this? 🤔 Like saying "If you can't, good night. I'm not paying if agreed svcs not provided. Have a great night!"

Hm..I wonder how I can not pay when I paid in advance. Also, doesn't change the fact that he just wasn't good. I asked him to leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pupiggy said:

Hm..I wonder how I can not pay when I paid in advance. Also, doesn't change the fact that he just wasn't good. I asked him to leave.

Hmm... I wonder how one can complain about a provider doing exactly what the client agreed to change the plans to.

Pick a pony. Did you ask him to leave because he was not good? Or did you agree to invite a top friend over who then hogged the provider like you said at first?

Because if everything you said is true, you are saying one of two things happened: (1) Pvd could not top. Clt said "please leave." Pvd said what if your friend tops me. Clt says "sure; let me get him over." Clt complains when top friend tops Pvd like Clt agreed he could for rest of time. OR (2) Pvd could not top. Pvd said what if your friend tops me. Clt says "sure; let me get him over." Top friend hogs Pvd for ??? time. Clt asks Pvd to leave early, but only after letting top friend top Pvd for a while. Clt complains about the alternate plan he agreed to.

That dog don't hunt.

"My barber came over to cut my hair. His scissors were dull. He suggested my stylist friend come over to cut his hair. I am so mad that I did not get a haircut, my barber got a haircut from my friend, and I paid my barber for a haircut. I could have never seen that coming when thr scissors were dull."

Not disagreeing that the provider is not good based on all feedback. Am disagreeing that the version of the night presented holds water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, pupiggy said:

Where do you get off filling in all of the details of what happened? You're really going out of your way to be a total dick.

First, I only repeated your details, neither of us got off. Second, my original comment was meant lightheartedly but cut too close to the bone(r). Third, I responded to you in the same manner in which you responded to me (perhaps more absolutely, but in kind). 😊

47 minutes ago, pupiggy said:

He said he wanted to top me with someone else. Do you really think I'm that dumb?

You invited a top friend to join your date with an already underperforming provider, at the suggestion of the provider no less. I simply posit that one loses much of the high ground when one goes along with dubious ideas from dubious sources that turn out exactly how one might expect.

REGARDLESS - I apologize for any and all offense; not my intent. My response was an examination of logic only, not an indictment.

Truly, welcome to the forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people are being too harsh on you @pupiggy

I’m so sorry you were disappointed with your experience.

Occasionally, tops can’t get hard. That definitely would have been an issue had you explicitly booked him in order to get fucked.

I honestly would have asked for my money back and sent him away. If he didn’t return it, then a bad review on RM, as well as on here, is very much justified. 👍 

Seems you invited another top over and the two escorts spent more time with each other than with you. That would be disappointing for sure, but I wouldn’t count it as warranting a bad review. You would be consenting to 
his presence in the moment.

 

Again, sorry this happened to you 😞- next time a client is unable to get hard (given you booked them so you can get fucked), ask for your money back and for them to kindly leave, and if they don’t do so, a bad review and a thread here are valid.
 

It can be intimidating to ask a guy to leave and to get your money back. I feel like people aren’t putting themselves in your shoes lol. But that would be the thing to do.

P.S- Given @Yukon21 ‘s previous thread, there is definitely reason to be suspicious of this provider.

Edited by Lolito
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DFdub said:

First, I only repeated your details, neither of us got off. Second, my original comment was meant lightheartedly but cut too close to the bone(r). Third, I responded to you in the same manner in which you responded to me (perhaps more absolutely, but in kind). 😊

You invited a top friend to join your date with an already underperforming provider, at the suggestion of the provider no less. I simply posit that one loses much of the high ground when one goes along with dubious ideas from dubious sources that turn out exactly how one might expect.

REGARDLESS - I apologize for any and all offense; not my intent. My response was an examination of logic only, not an indictment.

Truly, welcome to the forum.

Your highfalutin language isn't doing you any flavors in garnering authority. 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...