So how bout them dodgers :)

[SAdler]

I hope the humor in this cliche is understood before it's deleted Heh heh.

[BewareofNick]

It is indeed. You've been trying to dodge your dishonesty and your hypcorisy all day.

[joel304]

>I hope the humor in this cliche is understood before it's

>deleted Heh heh.

 

"Dodgers" should be capitalized, and the sentence should end with a question mark, you lying man w*h*o*r*e :) :)

 

I think that Scott is reaching out to all of you nice ladies. Let's be nice now. As I said before, Scott is a wonderful date. He did tell me that I was cute though, so he's probably a liar as well

 

What's that prison in SO Cal? It's funny to think of all the old poofs grabbing at their chests, just waiting for the Sheriff. On a positive note, sex is free in the joint, and even better if you have money to pay for the new meat arrivals (18-21) off of the Sheriff's bus.

[SAdler]

LOL. Again, another point proven

 

I envy you BoN, yes you heard right.

 

I wish the most pressing matter on my plate in life was dealing with you and following you around this message center. Unfortunately, I have obligations, friends, things to do and most importantly .... a life.

 

Thanks for walking into this one.

[Guest 2004]

I find no value to your post. You speak of humor yet you're continued falsehoods have left many of us with a very sober view of what you're truly about. That vision is not one of respect or integrity.

 

---/

In time it will all come crashing down.

[Guest 2004]

> so he's probably a liar as well

>

 

JOEL WE FINALLY FINALLY FINALLY ARE IN COMPLETE AGREEMENT! THIS IS A REAL BREAKTHROUGH!

 

---/

Time is magical.

[joel304]

>I find no value to your post. You speak of humor yet you're

>continued falsehoods have left many of us with a very sober

>view of what you're truly about. That vision is not one of

>respect or integrity.<

 

 

Earth to fellow members ... Respect, integrity, meet prostitution solicitation site ... come on already gents ... this isn't a nice place

[joel304]

Dear 2004, has the sarcasm escaped you? I remain a fan of Scott's and you should give a try for yourself. Speaking of liars, is your name really "2004?" Every truth is subjective, especially on our naughty little board.

 

"What on earth gave you the idea that I want to hear the story of your life?Save it for someone who cares -- if you can find such a person." All rights to Woodlawn

[BewareofNick]

>I wish the most pressing matter on my plate in life was

>dealing with you and following you around this message center.

> Unfortunately, I have obligations, friends, things to do and

>most importantly .... a life.

>

>Thanks for walking into this one.

 

Fascinating. You've changed from the Bill O'Liely excuse to the President Bush one (as to why he won't meet with Cindy Sheehan).

 

Scott, you have already given up honesty and forthrightness. Looks like you don't mind sacrificing your integrity as well.

[BewareofNick]

No one is questioning Scott's innate ability to fuck or the willingness of his hole.

 

What is at question here is Scott's honesty and integrity.

 

He is not trying to reach out. He has been thoroughly spanked and revealed to have been lying about a great many things that he has psoted here.

 

There are currently reviews on Scott posted here from when he was 17. Seems to me to be a potential legal issue for a few.

 

What Scott is trying to do is not "reach out" but to dodge responsibility for his actions.

 

Don't be so mesmerized by his abilities as a cockcsucker that you fail to see that.

[Traveller]

>Earth to fellow members ... Respect, integrity, meet

>prostitution solicitation site ... come on already gents ...

>this isn't a nice place

 

Good God. Signs of intelligent life. Maybe there is a smidge of hope for this place. Although instead of "continued falsehoods," there should be more posts about continued fucking. Speaking of which, another bud has become a working boy. Check out Chad on Chelsea Guys. Big fun and great fuck for an Italiano. He can be very nasty DickHo.

 

Later.

[joel304]

>No one is questioning Scott's innate ability to fuck or the

>willingness of his hole.<

 

That is a funny line. I often enjoy your posts.

 

>What is at question here is Scott's honesty and integrity.

 

I will say, he is one of the few escorts that I've met that was exactly his stated age. Right down to the birthday. That doesn't help the potential felons on here though. "Uncle Bill .... hello? Uncle Bill, WAKE UP ... somebody call 911" ... lol

 

Seriously though, what gives? Why are you so fixed on this kid's honesty, etc.? Maybe he fudged a little??? I don't know. As an attorney, I certainly wouldn't advise ANYONE to admit to ANYTHING with regards to this issue. Wouldn't you agree? "Thank God Uncle Bill, you're awake; just lay there, the ambulance is on the way."

 

>There are currently reviews on Scott posted here from when he

>was 17. Seems to me to be a potential legal issue for a few.<

 

Sssshh ... There are A LOT of issues on here that are best left alone.

 

>Don't be so mesmerized by his abilities as a cockcsucker that

>you fail to see that.<

 

Again. I ASSURE you that I am mesmerized ONLY by myself. I'm selfish, rich, pompous, successful, and my dates are always the envy of the ball ... and they're not always paid for either. I hire escorts for the fun and convenience. I'm not one of the bloated feet guys lying to mommy when I save up for the Motel 6.

 

I usually pick right when I hire, and I did with Scott. I don't give a fuck if he lies to me honey. I really don't. I really don't care much about his integrity either. I do care that he offers fun companionship, and wonderful sex. And he did.

 

Scott is also wonderful in social situations, and is a witty cat. I'm not looking for a mentor babe. Is anyone on here? Let's be honest. Muuuuuuuuuuah.

:-)

[BewareofNick]

I feel as though I've just been chastised by Sammy Davis Jr!

 

As I said, no one is questioning Scott's ability to get his ass fucked (a well practiced skill to be sure), as he has been doing since he was at least 15, and selling it shortly thereafter.

 

Scott was the one who made some pretty strong statements about things in regard to negotiation and that he's never advertised anywhere. He was caught in his lies by me and several others. Red Handed.

 

He resurrected this thread in what he though would be some positive self promotion and he got smacked down once again. No one to blame but himself.

 

All he has to do is say, "Ok. I wasn't 100% honest." That's all. Look what lying about his age has done and may do. There is now documentable evidence that Scott sold his ass at the age of 17. What about those 5 reviewers? Is it no big deal to them? We're always told how people are watching this site.

[augustman]

I may regret getting into this frey, but the what the hell not the first time I have been roasted. My opinion I believe the Scott early years have run their course. I do not have any real sympathy for the guys who hired Scott before 18. Anyone hiring a guy these days who claims to be under 21 is a fool. Plenty of stings set up to catch the trolling dicks off the internet. If anything I would like to know where the people who should have had a vested interest in his well being before 18. I would like to know what would force a 16 year old kid to be hustling for sex. Lets see 16 year old selling his goods vs. 50 year old man eyeing up 16 year old ass. Where do you think the issue is? Usually kids can get away with stuff for a little while but not two years. No doubt Scott is responsible and accountable for the decisions he made, but any parent in their right mind can't miss everything like, "Where is this money coming from?"

 

That said, is Scott's story on how the ad got placed 100% believable. I would say Scott you would have been better off just saying yes I the ad was there and since the time I was legal to operate as an escort I have not advertised or negotiated and moved on. I do not believe in this day and age of spin doctors that admitting this detracts from your current arguement regarding negotiation which I do not agree with.

 

Can we find away to move on, I prefer Scott adding his opinions as I do BON and 2004 but we do seem to want to sit on a subject until there is some sort of perceived victory.

[Uncle Bill]

Interesting that you bring me up. I guess that your comments are sparked by my second review of Scott, in which I stated: "I've known Scott for several years -- first met (and reviewed) him when he had just turned 18, and have hired him a number of times (including a very hot 3-way). Now he's almost 21, and he's hotter than ever."

 

Well, if you look at my first review of him dated 12/4/02, you'll note that I met him for the first time in November 2002 and that I even mentioned checking his ID. Given that he just turned 21 this month (August), it appears that he was telling me (and showing me on his ID) his correct age back then -- which was that he had recently turned 18 (I even learned his real name and address at the time, which he had absolutely no issue with). Scott was hot back then, and he's still a total hottie (better if anything). Since I wasn't involved in his earlier escapades, I won't comment on that except to say that we talked a little about his earlier experiences, and he was quite forthcoming with me. To my knowledge, I've never hired or hooked-up with anyone under 18 -- Scott was the closest, but he was of legal age when we met.

 

What's my opinion of Scott now? Have any of the various "discussions" changed my mind about him? I still love and appreciate him for sharing himself with me and for treating me in the very warm way he does (yes, for a price, but I have no illusions about that). For the nay-sayers, I'll just add that I'm not someone who gets off on being mistreated or who puts up with a lot of attitude. I definitely appreciate a hot body and cute face, but I have to make a personal connection with the guys I'm with to make it worthwhile, and the guy has to be at least as fun out of bed as in it. I treat the guys I meet as friends, and I find that comes back in how they treat me (again, most wouldn't be with me if money wasn't involved, but I've had a couple of very hot flings with young guys (18+) for free, so I know that the approach works in that area as well).

 

The funny thing is that I first contacted Scott because he was getting what I considered to be a raw deal on this board over his rates (yes, even back then). We met just for coffee the first time, and it was clear to me that he was special. He proved me right the next week when we met for a longer date. All this commotion over him again just makes me want to be with him and hold him -- and protect him (not that he needs protecting -- that's just my nature).

 

Final comment for the night -- if you think that I've been staying away from the MC because I was afraid of something, you're mistaken. I've just become very bored with the BS that is so frequently strewn about on this site. Having experienced some free (and very hot) hook-ups with several gorgeous and fun young guys, I'm also more into spending what time I have to waste on-line by pursuing that avenue. However, Scott and I stay in touch via email and phone, and he's usually the first guy I think of when my mind turns to hiring (or to hot, sweet guys in general).

[Guest 2004]

UB a very heartfelt post however, you completely missed the point. I don't feel anyone has questioned Scott's looks or sexual ability. No one that I'm aware of has even questioned his attitude. What is beyond question is his lak of honesty. Every post that you have responded to related to SA (and you have responded to every single one) seems to ignore what the real complaint about him has been. Again, that being is complete lack of honesty and integrity.

 

---/

Maybe in time you all will see the truth.

[ErikMcAlister]

>I feel as though I've just been chastised by Sammy Davis Jr!

 

Thank you for that!

 

PS: Scott is a pathetic, lying, insecure, freak who suffers delusions of grandeur and is too stupid to even contemplate not having all of the answers.

[spiro3]

It really is too bad that escortspeak.com is failing......for awhile it kept the rabid ones and their foamings at the mouth at bay.

 

But now I see they are baaaaack......gnashing their canines over the same old boring comments about who hates which escort the most. Ugh.

 

 

BO-AH, BO-AH, BO-AH! (Katherine Hepburn to Jane Fonda in "On Golden Pond")

[Curmudgeon]

>PS: Scott is a pathetic, lying, insecure, freak who suffers

>delusions of grandeur and is too stupid to even contemplate

>not having all of the answers.

 

Pot, meet kettle. You're both self-aggrandizing h00kers who think your shit don't stink.

 

It does.

 

 

The problem with making something foolproof is the universe keeps making better fools.

[Doug69]

>You're both self-aggrandizing h00kers who

>think your shit don't stink.

 

So many escorts used to post here. That was long ago, before the Curmudgeons of the Board arrived. Now, so few escorts post here.

 

People who post hateful trash like the above excerpt - which has no purpose other than to attack, insult and demean escorts, is the primary reason why this Board is now almost escort-free.

 

Thanks, Curmudgeon, and to all people like you, who seem incapable of treating any escorts with respect.

[Curmudgeon]

http://www.bitchslaponline.com/lmfao.gif

[joel304]

Doug,

 

This is a very caring post from you. To be frank, I'm a little surprised at your response. But you're right; the escorts have mainly run for cover, and that's not what an "escort board" should be about.

 

Your response did, however, get me thinking. When escorts post (under their business name) they are, in a large sense, putting their business and actual person at risk. When the likes of us post, it's just cyber fluff, anonymously thrown out there for digestion. Nothing more.

 

The same holds true for the Uncle Bill's of the world. They enjoy their Hooville gatherings, and maintain a neutral, non confrontational posting pattern, to avoid embarrassment and uncomfortable moments at the next get-together. With this in mind, I apologize to Uncle Bill for my pedophile (non fact based) insinuations.

 

Now, back to slamming the willing.

[Doug69]

>This is a very caring post from you. To be frank, I'm a

>little surprised at your response. But you're right; the

>escorts have mainly run for cover, and that's not what an

>"escort board" should be about.

 

A component of my post was satirical: how can one avoid mocking the Curmudgeon's of the world, who never cease - and I mean never cease - preaching about the need for civility and about the evils of personal attacks, only to then launch the most vicious, hateful, profane, insulting attacks (such as the one I excerpted) against whomever they don't like, whenever the mood strikes, all the while failing to recognize the glaring contradiction between their preaching and their behavior.

 

But another component of what I wrote was genuine. Escorts in particular tend to bear the brunt of these hypocrites' bitter attacks. They will be nice and condescendingly polite to escorts here as long as escorts know their place and stick to giggly, substance-less, submissive, non-controversial flattery and frivolity. But the minute an escort steps out of line and says anything which they don't like, the Preachers of Civility will attack with an unparalleled viciousness, threatening the escorts' reputations, calling them wh-ores, etc. etc.

 

I personally don't think there is anything wrong with attacking posts or posters which you think merit that. I do it, and that's exactly why I don't preach against it. But I don't single out escorts or hold them to some special standard of obsequiousness, and I don't attack them simply because they express opinions with which I disagree.

 

The Civility Priests like Curmudgeon do exactly this, as this thread demonstrates. Any escort who isn't sufficiently ass-licking and meek is a filthy, audacious whor*e in their eyes (which they point out in between preaching about the need for Civility here). Just witness the threats made, and attacks against, Greg (SeaBoy4Hire) and Vincent Michael recently, all because they had the audacity to post elsewhere.

 

And this, more than anything else, is the reason escorts don't post here anymore. One can't blame the "negative atmosphere" or the "negative posters" - those things, at least as the Niceness Priests mean them, have existed here for years while tons of escorts posted here regularly. What has changed is that this Board is now dominated by a group of old, faggy, smelly, creepy losers, such as Curmudgeon, who pretend to like escorts and to believe in "Civility" but will attack any of them with a real brutality if they're not acting like good, little, meek 15-year-old boys oozing gratitude for having a wrinkled, smelly old face with alcohol and mint breath blowing up their nostrils and age-spot-ridden old hands greedily groping at their genitals.

 

Escorts began disappearing here at an amazing rate only once this rancid crew showed up and demanded that all escorts act like a subservient Bobbi Thompson or else be branded dirty filthy ungrateful sluts who will never work in prostitution again.

 

>Your response did, however, get me thinking. When escorts

>post (under their business name) they are, in a large sense,

>putting their business and actual person at risk.

 

That is exactly why escort contributions on this Board tend, by and large, to be comprised of boring, neutral, frivolous dribble. With a few exceptions (the prostitutes attacked in this thread being examples), nothing they write is honest. They pretend to find obese, old guys hot (rather than sources of income). They will exchange the most transparently idiotic banter with the old losers here, pretending to enjoy it. That's because most escorts who post here are posting a running advertisement for their services, rather than anything real. And the few escorts who won't stay confined to this character prison are viciously attacked by the Curmudgeon's of the Board.

 

>The same holds true for the Uncle Bill's of the world. They

>enjoy their Hooville gatherings, and maintain a neutral, non

>confrontational posting pattern, to avoid embarrassment and

>uncomfortable moments at the next get-together. With this in

>mind, I apologize to Uncle Bill for my pedophile (non fact

>based) insinuations.

 

I'll leave it to others to assess whether your pedophile insinuations against the creepily named "Uncle Bill" are fact based or not, but I hardly think it's an act of profound bravery to post about your attraction to adolescent looking boys just because you thereafter show up at a social gathering with other like-minded people.

[ErikMcAlister]

>>PS: Scott is a pathetic, lying, insecure, freak who suffers

>>delusions of grandeur and is too stupid to even contemplate

>>not having all of the answers.

>

>Pot, meet kettle. You're both self-aggrandizing h00kers who

>think your shit don't stink.

>

>It does.

 

I've never said anything of the kind. Please read my post, though. I said that he's too stupid to admit not having all of the answers. I KNOW that for which QED stands, and, were I not to know & be shown to be wrong, I'd admit it. We can't say that for poor, dear Scooter, can we?

[Guest Conway]

Or maybe they disappeared because people like you and Woody began publishing some supposed inside knowledge that you have of their HIV status. God knows, if anyone is stupid enough to have unprotected sex with a professional ho, then he or she does so with the reasonable assumption that his or her risk of contracting HIV is substantially higher that that of someone who practices safe sex with an industry pro.

 

No one here needs some revenge harboring, former unemployed who*re asshole like you to take over the role of protector of our collective HIV status. We're all big boys. We can all read, so we know the dangers of unprotected sex. And, we all know that the risk of contracting HIV grows with every high risk encounter that we, collectively, might have. We are perfectly capable of protecting ourselves accordingly.

 

This forum declined for one reason and one reason only: Because of the anti-social behavior of people like you and these apparent revenge driven attacks against people that you have held grudges for years because they were better looking, better at the job and made more money than you could ever fathom making.

 

I'm really sorry that when you sold your ass for a living that you weren't good enough to make enough money to retire comfortably. Given the personality that you display here, I can see why you weren't successful as a wh*ore. It would had to have been an awfully good piece of ass to overcome the general unpleasantry of dealing with an angry old poof like you.