Deceptive New Masseur ads

[Lewis H]

A new masseur on MassageM4M had one glowing review and somewhat attractive pics.

 

http://www.massagem4m.com/masseur.cfm?id=13326

 

"Tim" looked cute in the pic and was personable on the phone ((917) 226-0797). However, when I showed up to the well-appointed 69th Street apartment( there was a humongous 40+" flatscreen in the livingroom), he didn't look quite like his pics. I chalked it up to a change in hairstyle, but still wasn't sure. I went with it anyhow. There was a table, but the towels laid out on it had a smell of oil from previous usage, I assumed. The massage itself was firm and showed some technique, but really uneventful. When he disrobed for the end release, I found his body to be rather average, and actually a bit pudgy to the touch, not what the body shot in the ad suggested Either it was him a few pounds later, or it wasn't him to begin with. Looking at him directly, he really didn't look like the person in the pics on the ad.

 

Overall, he wasn't bad as a masseur, although not spectacular either, but had I known ahead of time that the photos didn't match the actual person I met up with I would have chosen someone else. I later went back to post a review of him and found another person I had bookmarked, "Eric" had exactly the same location of 69th Street and Broadway, similar b&w face pic and colored 'body shot', and one stellar review written in a very similar tone. After the fact, I felt rather hookwinked. I emailed the site administrators of M4M to let them know that yet another person might be using fake pics , as this has happened to me before. I went back in to compare again for this missive, and "Eric' has been deleted from the Manhattan roster.

 

If you like soft, Turkish twinks, this guy might be for you, since he had some skills and wasn't all bad. But if you're going by the pics for a sensual massage, be forewarned you might not be getting what you expect.

 

I wonder if I should bother posting this as a review here? These masseurs have a tendency to disappear very quickly.

[Guest josephga]

I looked at the web link. i can tell you str8 up that shirtless pic isnt his it belongs to guy that lives in atlanta that doesnt even do massage work. i dont trust headless pics. most dick and ass or headless shots are fake. thats why i never pose nude in my massage ads i would only do it if my face was showing so there would be no confusion if it was me or not. then i would have to worry about my pics being stolen..

[Lewis H]

Well, here's the second ad with a similar format and in the exact same location. Buyer beware! Uncertain if this is the same guy, but I suggest you make sure before booking.

 

http://www.massagem4m.com/masseur.cfm?id=13319

[KENNY45]

What you are describing is just plain SLEAZY with a capital "S".

 

I would be shocked if you had a similar experience as this with masseurfinder.com, a favorite site of mine.

 

However, nothing is one hundred percent even with the best-run sites.

 

As they say in the good ole USA: "Caveat emptor" ("Let the buyer beware.")

 

KENNY

[Lewis H]

>What you are describing is just plain SLEAZY with a capital

>"S".

>

>I would be shocked if you had a similar experience as this

>with masseurfinder.com, a favorite site of mine.

>

>However, nothing is one hundred percent even with the best-run

>sites.

>

>As they say in the good ole USA: "Caveat emptor" ("Let the

>buyer beware.")

>

>KENNY

 

Well, the other 'person' (or should that be 'persona?') is on Masseurfinder as well:

http://www.masseurfinder.com/members/m4m_alex.shtml. Both sites have nearly identical masseur rosters.

[+ Axiom2001]

I can really identify with the thread of the creator. Just last Sunday I went to see a masseur whose ads appeared on http://www.Craigslist.org. The two pics that he submitted on C'sList and the two that he uploaded and sent to me were definitely not of him!

 

The massage was to have a 4hand massage; he was in his studio apartment when I arrived, looking not as his pics at all. His partner (if there were ever one) never arrived, and the guy COULD NOT massage at all.

 

I think he was more interesting in performing oral on me; he did a stellar job at this, and a while ago I thought he should be advertising as one who gives OUTSTANDING head instead of as one of two who give 4hand massages.

 

I paid the asking fee because I only took the exact amount of money with me to his apartment. Next time I will have 20s and 10s and give accordingly.

 

(I sent him an email when I arrived back home which was rather candid. I also complimented him on his oral skills; he has not responded, nor has his ad/ads appeared on C'sL since then!)

 

 

-----

[+ Axiom2001]

>A new masseur on MassageM4M had one glowing review and

>somewhat attractive pics.

>

>http://www.massagem4m.com/masseur.cfm?id=13326

>

>"Tim" looked cute in the pic and was personable on the phone

>((917) 226-0797). However, when I showed up to the

>well-appointed 69th Street apartment( there was a humongous

>40+" flatscreen in the livingroom), he didn't look quite like

>his pics. I chalked it up to a change in hairstyle, but still

>wasn't sure. I went with it anyhow. There was a table, but the

>towels laid out on it had a smell of oil from previous usage,

>I assumed. The massage itself was firm and showed some

>technique, but really uneventful. When he disrobed for the end

>release, I found his body to be rather average, and actually a

>bit pudgy to the touch, not what the body shot in the ad

>suggested Either it was him a few pounds later, or it wasn't

>him to begin with. Looking at him directly, he really didn't

>look like the person in the pics on the ad.

>

>Overall, he wasn't bad as a masseur, although not spectacular

>either, but had I known ahead of time that the photos didn't

>match the actual person I met up with I would have chosen

>someone else. I later went back to post a review of him and

>found another person I had bookmarked, "Eric" had exactly the

>same location of 69th Street and Broadway, similar b&w face

>pic and colored 'body shot', and one stellar review written in

>a very similar tone. After the fact, I felt rather hookwinked.

>I emailed the site administrators of M4M to let them know that

>yet another person might be using fake pics , as this has

>happened to me before. I went back in to compare again for

>this missive, and "Eric' has been deleted from the Manhattan

>roster.

>

>If you like soft, Turkish twinks, this guy might be for you,

>since he had some skills and wasn't all bad. But if you're

>going by the pics for a sensual massage, be forewarned you

>might not be getting what you expect.

>

>I wonder if I should bother posting this as a review here?

>These masseurs have a tendency to disappear very quickly.

 

 

 

 

:-( :-( :-( WRITE a review on http://www.massagem4m.com voicing everything that you have done here; therefore, others will (I hope!) not be duped or exploited.

[Lewis H]

I did. It didn't get printed. Apparently, the masseurs have the option to remove one review of their choice from those received, so "tim" kept the one that, in all likelihood, he planted himself.x(

[Guest josephga]

yeah some sites will let you remove one bad review every 3 months

iv been lucky doing massage for 9 years iv only recieved 1 bad review. i had a client who came to me 5 times on the 5th time he asked for escorting i said no so he wrote a bad review.. i was shown the review and it was never published.. I think allot of masseurs will offer clients a discount to write a review.. to me thats buying a review which i refuse too do.. Iv seen ads with over 100 reviews i think a large number of those reviews are self published i dont think most people are going to take the time to write a review. I personally have given around 8000 massage with only 20 reviews. i think most just dont take the time to do it..

[Guest zipperzone]

I'm still trying to figure out what your mention of a 40"+ flat screen TV in the living room has to do with his appearance or massage skills.

[alanalt]

Obviously the flat-screen TV was to demonstrate why the apartment was described as well-appointed!

[Guest zipperzone]

>Obviously the flat-screen TV was to demonstrate why the

>apartment was described as well-appointed!

 

I kinda figured that to be the case. I guess my question should have been, what did a well appointed apartment on 69th street have to do with a mediocre massage and disappointing looks?

 

But someone must have liked him - 69th isn't exactly in the low rent district.

:-)

[Lewis H]

>I'm still trying to figure out what your mention of a 40"+

>flat screen TV in the living room has to do with his

>appearance or massage skills.

 

Actually, it has nothing to do with his being a masseur, now that you mention it. It was just so huge it left an impression because it was so disproportionate to the room and it was on my mind when I started this thread.

[Guest zipperzone]

>>I'm still trying to figure out what your mention of a 40"+

>>flat screen TV in the living room has to do with his

>>appearance or massage skills.

>

>Actually, it has nothing to do with his being a masseur, now

>that you mention it. It was just so huge it left an impression

>because it was so disproportionate to the room and it was on

>my mind when I started this thread.

 

OK - that's cool.

[+ glutes]

ZZ, is the guy on 69th ST 'Alex'?

 

http://www.massagem4m.com/masseur.cfm?id=13319