Dominant Twinks! (And other fetishes...)

[guptasa1]

Well, thought I'd share since I think my major fetish is at least a little rare. This actually encompasses several fetishes/kinks I suppose, but I really like being with dominant and assertive "twinky" type bois. I'm still pretty young at 23, but I really like guys a little younger than me who like to take control and assert themselves with me (but still in a kind and loving way). Something about guys that seem innocent at first but like to really assert themselves appeals to me a lot.

 

Along with that, I like the ideas of being spanked, pinned, tickled...maybe tied up, teased, cum control, etc. Some of this stuff I haven't tried and only think I'll like at this point, but it's at least stuff I'm interested in. I also like someone who's verbally aggressive (but still loving...not abusive unless its clearly roleplay).

 

I also like some weird things like the furry fandom, electrostimulation, and machine sex, among other things. I'm pretty interested in new and different things involving sex. =oP

 

There are also other things I'm curious about but don't know that I'd like (might and might not) such as watersports.

 

Anyways, just sharing. Anybody feel free to add their own two cents about the above (or ask anything), etc. hehe.

[Guest DevonSFescort]

>This actually encompasses several fetishes/kinks I suppose, but I >really like being with dominant and assertive "twinky" type bois.

 

You and me both. There's nothing like a twink who can make you his bitch. Unlike you, however, I don't need them to be kind and loving about it. Actually, I love watching them wear themselves out trying to hurt me. Although I love being dominated, I'm not the least bit submissive and like to make whoever's supposedly in charge work for it.

 

>Something about guys that seem innocent at first but like to really >assert themselves appeals to me a lot.

 

Me too. Sometimes, they actually ARE innocent at first and are embarrassed or confused when I try and get them to be dominant, or to show off and flex their little twink muscles for me. Then it's EXTREMELY hot to see their surprise at how turned on they're getting -- to see how they do that 180 in such a short time.

 

If they just don't get it, though, that's no problem: I just take over and make them MY bitch, which is also fun and which often seems to come more naturally to them anyway.

 

>I'm pretty interested in new and different things involving sex.

 

In that case, you might want to try having your next dominant twink make a fist, stick it in your belly button, and push, starting a little lightly at first and then pushing harder and harder, even putting as much of his body weight as he can support into the effort. If your abs are strong he can even use his heel instead and stand on one foot (though you'll probably have to steady him so he doesn't lose his balance and fall). I know -- it's bizarre, and it may not do a thing for you -- but for me my belly button is like a second prostate. In fact, I think in my case it's more of a prostate than my prostate. Go figure.

[Doug69]

>>This actually encompasses several fetishes/kinks I suppose,

>but I >really like being with dominant and assertive "twinky"

>type bois.

>

>You and me both. There's nothing like a twink who can make

>you his bitch. Unlike you, however, I don't need them to be

>kind and loving about it. Actually, I love watching them wear

>themselves out trying to hurt me. Although I love being

>dominated, I'm not the least bit submissive and like to make

>whoever's supposedly in charge work for it.

 

Here's a little present - actually, a huge present - for both of you:

 

HotYngMassage4u@aol.com

 

Don't let the generic screen name fool you. In terms of what you're both describing - and well beyond that - it doesn't get any more authentic, intense, and fulfilling than this. He's 22 and has an incomparably unlimited, primal, and assertive sexuality. Here are 2 links, the second of which definitely works, the first of which might:

 

http://pak01.pictures.aol.com/NASApp/ygp/Login?event=DirectView&shareInfo=qehO4z9cYllZb0cWlw1X3q%2bzV%2b%2ba5ln%2bKUGsflC5PWOb3KiItBhVhQ%3d%3d&pageName=AlbumViewFromEmails&locale=en_US

 

OR

 

hometown.aol.com/hotyngmassage4u

 

Believe me, this is what you are seeking, and more.

[guptasa1]

Thanks both of you for the comments/links.

 

Glad to know I'm not alone in what I like even though you're a bit more hardcore about it - hehe. Don't get me wrong - I'm submissive and like to be made the boi's bitch - I just personally need to feel safe and cared for by the person at the same time; he can be as demanding as he wants, though - I like that and serving his needs as long as that trust is there. =oP I was thinking body worship and being told what to do there might be hot too - another thing I've never really tried but am curious about.

 

Also, thanks for the link. Looks like a cool guy. I'd be interested to see some reviews, etc.

 

I already see someone semi-regularly (Dylan #3 NYC in the reviews) who's very good with me in these respects. He treats me awesome but likes to be aggressive too, and I really feel I can trust him. We haven't tried all of the kinks I mentioned above or anything, but it's a great start for me since I'm new to it, and he reads me really well.

[Doug69]

>Glad to know I'm not alone in what I like even though you're a

>bit more hardcore about it - hehe.

 

I didn't say what I like or don't like. I'm just telling you that the young gentleman (a TOTAL misnomer, thankfully - "beast" is more accurate) whom I brought to your attention is someone who would be well worth your efforts to meet.

 

Don't get me wrong - I'm

>submissive and like to be made the boi's bitch - I just

>personally need to feel safe and cared for by the person at

>the same time;

 

This is such an interesting combination, but you can't really be dominated by someone who doesn't exhibit an ability to compel you to do things against your will, can you? I mean, how can you take anyone seriously who is purporting to dominate you if all they do is allow you to do whatever you want and to ensure that you constantly feel "safe"? Isn't some fear of genuine punishment (physical, emotional, psychological or some other form) in the event of your noncompliance a prerequisite to authentic submission?

 

he can be as demanding as he wants, though - I

>like that and serving his needs as long as that trust is

>there. =oP

 

What exactly do you have to "trust"? That he won't make you do something you don't want to do (in which case, isn't it really about serving YOUR needs, not his?), or that he will make you do whatever he wants even if you don't want to, but that he won't break your neck or kill you in order to force obedience, but instead, will do something more reasonable and mild?

 

>I was thinking body worship and being told what

>to do there might be hot too - another thing I've never really

>tried but am curious about.

 

On one level, I was surprised to learn that you are only 23, which I learned in a post you wrote a couple of weeks ago where you revealed that for the first time (at least that I saw). I was surprised because you have a complexity of thought and openness to things which made me think you were older, but at the same time, when you talk about sex and things which arouse you, there is always a nervousness and some underlying trepidation and fear about purusing what you want without constraints that does reflect some inexperience. Why do you have that? Why not just go do what you want and give up the trepdiation? What's to fear? Sex is the one place where being without restraints, and not allowing false fears to limit your possibilities, should be the easiest.

 

>Also, thanks for the link. Looks like a cool guy. I'd be

>interested to see some reviews, etc.

 

If you want a living, breathing illustration of what I mean to be sexually uninhibited in the purest, most powerful way possible (and I don't mean stupidly uninhibited as in unsafe sex, I mean liberatingly uninhibited as in having no sense of shame or guilt to suppress one's sexual and primal drives), the e-mail address I gave will lead you to that.

[guptasa1]

>I didn't say what I like or don't like. I'm just telling you

>that the young gentleman (a TOTAL misnomer, thankfully -

>"beast" is more accurate) whom I brought to your attention is

>someone who would be well worth your efforts to meet.

 

Sorry, I actually have responses to two different people kinda mixed together there in my initial response. LOL. =oP I was mainly referring to what Devon said there, but your comments are of course welcome. (I view the forums in linear mode, so often times I just reply to the last post).

 

>Don't get me wrong - I'm

>>submissive and like to be made the boi's bitch - I just

>>personally need to feel safe and cared for by the person at

>>the same time;

>

>This is such an interesting combination, but you can't really

>be dominated by someone who doesn't exhibit an ability to

>compel you to do things against your will, can you? I mean,

>how can you take anyone seriously who is purporting to

>dominate you if all they do is allow you to do whatever you

>want and to ensure that you constantly feel "safe"? Isn't

>some fear of genuine punishment (physical, emotional,

>psychological or some other form) in the event of your

>noncompliance a prerequisite to authentic submission?

 

I agree it's an interesting combination. To be honest, I can't really answer how far I like to go as far as being dominated - I don't know myself yet. I guess I like feeling the other person DOES have control...and that I could be punished, but I also need to feel I'm safe with him and can trust his intentions even though he's got control. Make any sense?

 

>he can be as demanding as he wants, though - I

>>like that and serving his needs as long as that trust is

>>there. =oP

>

>What exactly do you have to "trust"? That he won't make you

>do something you don't want to do (in which case, isn't it

>really about serving YOUR needs, not his?), or that he will

>make you do whatever he wants even if you don't want to, but

>that he won't break your neck or kill you in order to force

>obedience, but instead, will do something more reasonable and

>mild?

 

I just need to trust the person and that his intentions toward me are good. I like to please, so in general there isn't much I wouldn't do for a partner as long as it's reasonably safe (from a health standpoint). On the other hand, I do like a partner, even if aggressive and dominant, who, if he sees something is distressing me or I really don't like something, is sensitive to that. For example (excuse the graphicness, but this is the best way I can illustrate what I'm trying to say), I'm not yet good at deepthroating huge cocks. I love to try it and do the best I can, but at some point when it gets uncomfortable (I'm gagging too much, etc.), I like the partner I'm with to switch to something else so it's more enjoyable for us both. I do like someone who wants us BOTH to have a good time - I just like him to have an aggressive side since I'm pretty passive. =o) I like losing control and being punished, but with a partner who can be caring and tender too.

 

This isn't flat-out S&M, and I'm really not sure how to classify it. It's just what I'm into - lol.

 

I'm really not sure if I'd like a partner who doesn't care at ALL if I'm having a good time and is ONLY worried about himself and his needs. I know some people are into that, but I just don't think it's my thing. I sincerely do like a partner who treats me well but still clearly has control and wants us both to have a good and exciting time.

 

>On one level, I was surprised to learn that you are only 23,

>which I learned in a post you wrote a couple of weeks ago

>where you revealed that for the first time (at least that I

>saw). I was surprised because you have a complexity of

>thought and openness to things which made me think you were

>older, but at the same time, when you talk about sex and

>things which arouse you, there is always a nervousness and

>some underlying trepidation and fear about purusing what you

>want without constraints that does reflect some inexperience.

>Why do you have that? Why not just go do what you want and

>give up the trepdiation? What's to fear? Sex is the one

>place where being without restraints, and not allowing false

>fears to limit your possibilities, should be the easiest.

 

Thank you for the compliment. =o) I do try to be open-minded. You're right - I am nervous about a lot of this, and I am inexperienced in some regards as well. I tend to be a shy and nervous person by nature in general, so it's not strictly limited to the area of sex. Actually, I'm more adventurous sexually than in many other areas of my life, but I do take it gradually and tend to ease into things. That's just my way.

 

>>Also, thanks for the link. Looks like a cool guy. I'd be

>>interested to see some reviews, etc.

>

>If you want a living, breathing illustration of what I mean to

>be sexually uninhibited in the purest, most powerful way

>possible (and I don't mean stupidly uninhibited as in unsafe

>sex, I mean liberatingly uninhibited as in having no sense of

>shame or guilt to suppress one's sexual and primal drives),

>the e-mail address I gave will lead you to that.

 

Hmmm...I'll keep that in mind. It does sound intriguing to say the least. =o)

[DelawareGuy]

The guy in north Jersey certainly looks hot, but might be too far to travel to me (north Delaware). I have been looking for an aggressive, dominant, top twink/jock. Anybody in my area have any suggestions?

[Skyyguy]

I agree with you on this. Not full S&M, just some control and fun, as long as everyone is having fun. I also have a foot fetish, and enjoy the dominant guy controlling me with his feet.

[Guest DevonSFescort]

>What exactly do you have to "trust"?

 

I think voluntarily submitting to many kinds of domination or other rough sexual treatment, if not inevitably, at least frequently, involves trust, or something fairly close to it. It seems to me implicit in the surrender of control, which is why I've often looked back on the first ride I ever took on the back of a hot guy's motorcycle as an early S/M experience, notwithstanding the absence of actual physical pain. A lot of the thrill comes from the same place as the rush one gets from other types of risk-taking. But someone who has a hard time trusting people might have an easier time throwing caution to the winds in a situtation where the risk he's taking could reasonably be called "impersonal" -- the closest what he's doing comes to "trust" is a generic blind faith that the universe, God, fate, chance or whatever he believes in will spare him. Or it's a faith in his own exceptionalism. When the risk involves putting another person, especially one you don't know, in control, one has a much narrower, and therefore (hopefully) more intense focal point for that sense of surrender, which can release sublime or ecstatic responses. When the chemistry between the two parties is there, the experience can be profound, as your posts seem to attest. I can't remember if you actually used that word -- "profound" -- in either of your posts, but I can tell you that what impresses me most about this boy is certainly not his pics (though I do like the ones where he's in leather and given his stated interests I think he should have them closer to the beginning of his selection), but your intense written responses to your experience.

 

I haven't looked to see whether he's been reviewed, but if you haven't already, I hope you'll share some version of your powerfully expressed comments with a wider audience than will ever see this thread -- i.e., by submitting a review. That kind of praise from one of our least cultish observers of the escort scene, I expect, will stick with me and with many others a lot longer than just about any review I've read of escorts I find much hotter on a purely physical level.

[guptasa1]

For me, trust is one of the absolute most important factors in an experience. I like feeling I can give the person control and let my guard down and know I'm safe. In fact, I might even go so far as to say part of the appeal of having someone in control for me is getting to learn to trust them and feel safe with them. I love feeling vulnerable but safe in someone's arms. To me, there's nothing like some discipline (being spanked for example) or aggression (being ravaged - lol) and then curling up with that person and knowing he'll be tender and kind and gentle with me too. (Keep in mind I prefer longer sessions like overnights or occasionally weekends, so that comes into play here too.)

 

Oh - forgot to comment on the pressing the belly thing in your initial reply. That actually sounds pretty interesting - I think it might work for me as I'm fairly sensitive there. Perhaps I'll give it a try sometime.

[Doug69]

>I think voluntarily submitting to many kinds of domination or

>other rough sexual treatment, if not inevitably, at least

>frequently, involves trust, or something fairly close to it.

>It seems to me implicit in the surrender of control, which is

>why I've often looked back on the first ride I ever took on

>the back of a hot guy's motorcycle as an early S/M experience,

>notwithstanding the absence of actual physical pain.

 

I agree that genuine submission requires some preexisting trust; when one makes the choice to surrender control, one is necessarily trusting that the submission will lead to something fulfilling.

 

But I don't think this type of "trust" is the type to which Guptasa is alluding, i.e., some sort of faith that the person to whom you're submitting will be considerate and nice and willing to abide by your limits and desires and will make sure that you're having a nice and comfortable time. Instead, the only trust that is necessary is that the relinquishing of control will, in some almost certainly unexpected way, lead to something fulfilling, arousing, growth-generating, etc. This may occur precisely because the person disregards or even deliberately stomps on your needs and fears entirely, which can dispel or even eradicate them, or because you end up breathing in entire new worlds as a result of the places to which submission to someone worthwhile or powerful can uniquely take you.

 

Many people think that submission of this sort is a reflection of weakness or defect, but I think exactly the opposite is true. The act of choosing to submit is one of the most powerful choices there is, and only fear and shame prevents people from seeing and profiting from its virtues. I could go on and on about the incomparably powerful and enriching benefits of submission (Greek students sat on the floor at Socrates' feet and addressed him as "Master"; Talmudic students are requried to pledge absolute obedience and subservience to the will of their rabbinical mentors; captives forced into submission ultimately ingest and incorporate the strengths and power of their catpors, etc.), but all I'm really saying for now is that this notion -- that "trust" in the person is necessary for submission -- can destroy the unique power of submission (including its capacity to arouse) if the requisite "trust" is understood to mean the type of "trust" which one would want in a boyfriend, or a doctor, or a friend. The presence of that sort of trust can often destroy, rather than enable, genuinely worthwhile submission, and can completely prevent the fear-destroying and limit-destroying benefits which submission can uniquely provide.

 

>A lot of

>the thrill comes from the same place as the rush one gets from

>other types of risk-taking.

 

Exactly - and "trust" can be the antithesis of risk. Too much trust = no risk = no value.

 

I

>can't remember if you actually used that word -- "profound" --

>in either of your posts, but I can tell you that what

>impresses me most about this boy is certainly not his pics

>(though I do like the ones where he's in leather and given his

>stated interests I think he should have them closer to the

>beginning of his selection), but your intense written

>responses to your experience.

 

I think submission can be profoundly fulfilling sexually and/or non-sexually, and if you have one, you are almost certain to have the other. One rarely occurs without the other, even in those seemingly asexual examples I described above.

 

Most of the behaviors and attributes of this creature from Northern New Jersey which provoked my boundless enthusiasm would almost certainly be condemned by the snooty, nose-upturning denizens of this Board -- which should only underscore how well-advised you would be to give him a call the next time you are in NYC. I'm sure that in your (ahem) extensive sexual travels you have developed the ability to distinguish between those who pretend to like and to be certain things and those who genuinely are those things at their core. Only the latter has value, in my view, and it doesn't get any more authentic than him when it comes to the matters we are currently discussing.

[+ Lucky]

RESubmissive Doug (And other fetishes...)

 

Doug, you may submit to me at any time. Just be prepared.

[Doug69]

RE: RESubmissive Doug (And other fetishes...)

 

>Doug, you may submit to me at any time. Just be prepared.

 

I knew there was the chance - indeed, the liklihood - that some cretin here would respond to what I wrote with this sort of stupidity, but I never expected that the imagery which would be evoked by the respone would be quite as wretched and nauseating as the image which you created. Congratulations on exceeding what I thought was possible.

[guptasa1]

>But I don't think this type of "trust" is the type to which

>Guptasa is alluding, i.e., some sort of faith that the person

>to whom you're submitting will be considerate and nice and

>willing to abide by your limits and desires and will make sure

>that you're having a nice and comfortable time. Instead, the

>only trust that is necessary is that the relinquishing of

>control will, in some almost certainly unexpected way, lead to

>something fulfilling, arousing, growth-generating, etc. This

>may occur precisely because the person disregards or even

>deliberately stomps on your needs and fears entirely, which

>can dispel or even eradicate them, or because you end up

>breathing in entire new worlds as a result of the places to

>which submission to someone worthwhile or powerful can

>uniquely take you.

 

I do see your point. I'm just not sure it applies to everyone the exact same way - the phrase "different strokes for different folks" comes to mind.

 

While I like to be treated aggressively, I'm also a fairly emotionally vulnerable person who, when giving someone control, can legitimately be hurt if I feel I'm not pleasing him or he's angry with me (I'm talking more emotionally here)...and not at all in a good way. Because of that, one of the big things I have to feel, more than anything, is cared for by the person I'm with, EVEN if they don't necessarily uphold all my needs. Actually, though it's never happened yet, I think it'd be not only fine but exciting if the person wanted to stomp on all my other needs and make me fully submit as long as I felt cared for and never thought he held malice towards me. But I am a fairly fragile person, and I need someone who's going to be caring too, or I could see it being be a very bad experience for me.

 

I hope I'm making sense here. I certainly don't mean to try to invalidate any of the things you're saying. I just think different people have different needs they can't have a good experience without...and different "learning curves" so to speak as well.

[+ Lucky]

RE: RESubmissive Doug (And other fetishes...)

 

ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!

I love you doug. Well, not really...

[Bilbo]

gup = pup? Reading your last post, and then trying to think back to your list of the things you'd like to do with your Master, it occurs to me that you might really enjoy and learn from dog training, as a pet dog rather than a guard dog. It may sound strange to you now, but you might want to look at

 

leatherdog.com

 

and see if it appeals to you.

[guptasa1]

>gup = pup? Reading your last post, and then trying to think

>back to your list of the things you'd like to do with your

>Master, it occurs to me that you might really enjoy and learn

>from dog training, as a pet dog rather than a guard dog. It

>may sound strange to you now, but you might want to look at

>

>leatherdog.com

>

>and see if it appeals to you.

 

Hehe. I'm what you call a furry (hard to explain, but http://www.furnation.com would be a good place to start) and my other nick is WolfpupNX - I basically am a wolf puppy, at least in my viewpoint. =oP (Yes, I'm nuts, but it's actually a great deal of fun.) So yeah - you hit the nail on the head - that does appeal to me a great deal actually. =o) Thanks for sharing.

[Doug69]

>gup = pup? Reading your last post, and then trying to think

>back to your list of the things you'd like to do with your

>Master, it occurs to me that you might really enjoy and learn

>from dog training, as a pet dog rather than a guard dog. It

>may sound strange to you now, but you might want to look at

 

Wow, Bilbo - I have to hand it to you: you really nailed this. Those are some outstanding intuitive skills you've built up over the decades - you sniffed out the canine qualities in him before he ever hinted at his doggie persona. No barking, no tail-wagging, nothing - but you still somehow saw the little puppy yelping inside. I'm impressed!

[guptasa1]

Yeah - I'm pretty impressed too. *tailwags and rolls over* lol. =oP Seriously, it is neat that Bilbo saw that in me without me having to say anything. And I think that does sum up how I feel and my needs pretty well.

[Bilbo]

gup - Thanks for the compliments and the link. I just went there and it does look verry interesting. However, I got the feeling that I am stepping into the middle of a very large story/movement. I couldn't seem to find a page that just describes the philosophy of whats going on or an FAQ - probably just operator error here at my computer - so, would you mind giving us a quick sketch here?

 

On the leatherdog front, do you compete in the shows? Will you be coming to Houston for the Intenational? (It was started here and seems to be here every year. I hope it is because I definitely mean to go see it this year.)

 

Isn't it nice how older men are treated in the leather community? My cub, Maverick, has convinced me to try to keep my salt and pepper beard all through the Houston Summer heat this year. Well, that, and how so many people liked it and others like it at Let Us Entertain You Weekend.

[guptasa1]

>gup - Thanks for the compliments and the link. I just went

>there and it does look verry interesting. However, I got the

>feeling that I am stepping into the middle of a very large

>story/movement. I couldn't seem to find a page that just

>describes the philosophy of whats going on or an FAQ -

>probably just operator error here at my computer - so, would

>you mind giving us a quick sketch here?

 

Sorry 'bout that - the furnation site is more of a compilation of furry web pages, so it's prolly more my fault ya got lost. LOL. I'll try to provide a bit better of a link/explanation here.

 

http://www.anthrocon.org/info.cgi/about

 

Here's a pretty good and brief FAQ about furries from the biggest national convention (which I just started going to as of last year and plan to reattend this year; in fact, it was directly after this last year that I had my first experience with an escort since I was in the Philadelphia area and am not normally near cities).

 

There's a bit more to it than what the FAQ says, but it's a nice summary. A lot of furries, especially at that con (though I don't have one myself yet) like to wear fursuits (think similar to mascots).

 

You might need a free account from Imagestation to look through this, but I still have the photos I took up from last year. Towards the end of the album, there are even a few of me with a fur I know in a fursuit. hehe.

 

http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4289593473

 

The photos are mostly fursuits as you can see, and not everybody is in fursuits or anything in the furry fandom or at a con (that was just the focus of my photos since they're the most fun to look at). It's weird but a lot of fun. =o) I think I'm just gonna get a tail eventually - I've always kinda wanted a tail. LOL.

 

Online, furs are often very affectionate and do roleplay their characters, especially with each other. *snuggles and licks all the people staring at him, wagging his tail and prancing about sillily* A lot like that right there. =oP

 

There's also a lot of great furry artwork out there. I'll give a link to perhaps one of the best-known artists who tends to do softcore but still erotic poses. There's of course everything from completely non-erotic furry artwork to outright furry porn. LOL. This guy's really good though:

 

http://www.furnation.com/Wookiee/

 

>On the leatherdog front, do you compete in the shows? Will you

>be coming to Houston for the Intenational? (It was started

>here and seems to be here every year. I hope it is because I

>definitely mean to go see it this year.)

 

If your speaking to me, my apologies if you got the wrong impression. I've never actually gotten into the leatherdog scene at all - I just meant it does very much appeal to me. In some ways (actually, a lot of ways), the sexuality aspect of the furry fandom is very similar to this. You'll find a lot of furs on leashes with their lover holding the other end. LOL. So no, I'm not familiar with the shows or anything of leatherdog specifically, but I feel like I'm a little familiar with what it is, and I do like it.

 

>Isn't it nice how older men are treated in the leather

>community? My cub, Maverick, has convinced me to try to keep

>my salt and pepper beard all through the Houston Summer heat

>this year. Well, that, and how so many people liked it and

>others like it at Let Us Entertain You Weekend.

 

Awww...again, not necessarily familiar, but in the furry community there are young and old furs alike too of course, and everybody treats each other pretty well I think. =o) The leather community you speak of really does sound neat, thoughh.

 

Hope this clears things up. Any questions of course welcome. I'm half-tempted to maybe do a separate thread on this eventually.

[Bilbo]

Things have been very busy at the theater I run. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I hope it didn't give you the impression that I was turned off because you weren't what I'd come to think you were. And don't apologize for causing my wrong impression. It was a very sexy wrong impression to have, and I enjoyed it very much.

 

And I especially enjoyed the link to Wookee's art. Woh! Especially the Witelion. (The dalmation-man, too.)

 

Do you stay with one furry self or do you have several different ones you switch between? And what is it/are they? If I'm not being too forward. }(

[bigguyinpasadena]

I remember some sit-com episode that had a"furry"convention as one of it's thread!I just cannot renember which one.

Also,Dan Savage in his book SKIPPING TOWARDS GAMMORAH talks about going to a "fur"get together.

I would love to know how this fetish developed.I can se the leatherdog stuff-that seems logical(well as logical as any of theese sorts of things are)but dressing up like stuffed animals as an erotic element-please explain.

[VaHawk]

There was also an episode of CSI that dealt with group sex parties with people dressed up as animals. Until then, I'd never heard of this practice. I thought it was hilarious, but as they say whatever floats your boat.

[guptasa1]

This is a bam bam bam response, so I'm gonna be hitting all three of ya back with replies in one message. LOL. Hope das okay. =o)

 

Bilbo, no worries - I didn't take that as you being turned off at all - just figured you were busy or something. LOL. I am indeed interested in the leather and leatherdog communities - it's just not something I've experienced thus far. Who knows in the future? And again, I'd say in some respect, the sexual aspects of furry may have a lot in common with that. (Though sex certainly isn't all furry is about either - it's an entire spectrum just like life.)

 

Glad you liked Wookie's artwork. His art is really sexy in my opinion, and I love good furry art. (I like a wide variety of artwork, from Japanese yaoi animation (male/male love basically) to furry artwork, etc. - good sexy art really makes me hot and bothered sometimes. hehe. =o)

 

I have only one furry persona (though I have some friends with several). I'm a wolf (a wolf puppy to be exact)...not so extraordinary, but warm, friendly, and submissive - just a silly wolfypup. hehe. *wags his tail* It's fun. There are a lot of fursons out there who have more imaginary characters...magical furs with special abilities for example...or crossbreeds (such as a folf...a cross between a fox and a wolf...or a lox...a cross between a lion and a fox...my ex mate's...our word for boyfriend...a lox, though when we were together he was a fox - lol.) I'm just a cuddly wolf puppy. lol. It's pretty much me in a form I like and am more comfortable I suppose.

 

Regarding how the fetish developed, I really dunno. For a lot of people, it developed a lot earlier than me when they were tots (kinda like sexuality). For me, it was probably...oh...around 16 I'd say. I don't like to stereotype, but at least for me, and I think for a lot of other furs, I can say it often develops out of a couple things. For one, animation is one of my very favorite mediums...and at the time I got into it, I was quite taken by a beautiful animated film by the name of Balto (about Alaskan sled dogs and the Iditarod sled race...all furry-type talking characters, only not anthropomorphized in physical appearance exactly...think Lady & the Tramp type characters to know what I mean). It's still a great film - I highly recommend it if you're looking for something warm and sweet with great music and animation, as well as a great message.

 

Another reason furry appealed to me, it's a form where I like myself better to be honest (I have some self-esteem issues...and I used to have a lot more when I was quite overweight - I'm not anymore, though still not very toned - and even geekier than I am now...lol.) I have a very vivid imagination, and this is a good way for me to use it. Furry's also a place I found a lot of acceptance, which is appealing to anyone who's a little different - a place they feel they belong. I'm also INCREDIBLY shy, and it's somehow easier to socialize as a fur than as a crazy hyoooooman. lol. I've also always been better with communication online than in person. If you met me in person, you'd likely be surprised. While I'm very conversational with a lot to say online, I'm VERY quiet in real life, and it takes some time to get me talking much. It's just...both a lot of fun and easier to approach people as a wolfy for me. I even met my first and only boyfriend (mate) specifically because we were both furs, and the two years it lasted were WONDERFUL. Aside from that, I know enough to feel safe saying most fursuiters love the attention fursuits get them and making people smile and laugh and givin' out hugs. I mean...except for those who may have phobias of fursuits or something, I think it's at safe to say a large amount of people from kids to teens to adults love a big cartoon animal that's huggable and silly. LOL. Again, I don't want to generalize too much, and there may be a lot of other reasons out there, but these are a few that I can think of and that apply to my own experience (aside from the fursuit commment, which is just something I've heard over and over again).

 

Yes, there's a furry episode of CSI, and there's also a furry episode of ER (both of which I found fun to watch). There has also been an MTV documentory on it (Sex2K I think). All of them are a bit off in some respects but show interesting perspectives of being furry.

 

Anyways, hopefully this sheds some light, and I in no way mean to speak for everyone who's a fur - just my own perspective.