Today's Xander Review #7

[jawjateck]

The review is as minimal as I've ever read. It appears the two men didn't actually meet. Am I reading that correctly?

 

AND, this is no criticism of Xander whatsoever.

[seeker630]

The review is as minimal as I've ever read. It appears the two men didn't actually meet. Am I reading that correctly?

 

AND, this is no criticism of Xander whatsoever.

 

That bothered me a bit also - it does seem to be at odds with the statement in the FAQs, "Folks, if you didn't eat at the restaurant, I don't think you can write about the sashimi.".

 

Nice to see the other review with some concrete information about an actual encounter.

[wayout]

The review is as minimal as I've ever read. It appears the two men didn't actually meet. Am I reading that correctly?

 

AND, this is no criticism of Xander whatsoever.

 

It is one of the more unusual "reviews". Very surprised this one got through Daddy's review process. And in no way is this meant as a criticism of Xander.

 

Also, agreee with seeker about seeing the other review.

[Xander]

That bothered me a bit also - it does seem to be at odds with the statement in the FAQs, "Folks, if you didn't eat at the restaurant, I don't think you can write about the sashimi.".

 

Nice to see the other review with some concrete information about an actual encounter.

 

A restaurant is more than just the food. Very much like how a coffee bar is more than just the coffee (Case and point: Starbucks coffee SUCKS-- yet people go there for the ambience!). I can't really complain about anything good someone has to say about me

 

Its very surprising to see two reviews put up on the same day ... but no complaints

[robberbaron4u]

Perhaps, his experience with Xander was one of such excellence that the reviewer was at a loss for words to describe it, that is, an hour with Xander left the man knock-kneed and stuttering?

[bigvalboy]

I actually saw nothing unusual about it. The reviewer was very clear from what I read, that the encounter did not happen. I think that very often there are lengthy discussions on the forum about how cold or unresponsive escorts are in the initial meeting, this does show a positive side to Xander that might help others make a decision on whether or not to contact him.

As was his very professional response to the "satisfactory" review he received. I feel that his response is further proof that perhaps he is more professional than the reviewer gave him credit for.

 

 

We all take different things from reviews. I personally took something very positive from this and I am always impressed when an escort responds positively to my initial contact. I just hired and escort for an upcoming trip. I will be spending a fair amount of money on this little 3 day jaunt. The escort was extremely friendly when he responded to my emails, and had he not responded as such, I might not have gone through with the plans. First contact to me is very important information to have.

[wayout]

I actually saw nothing unusual about it. The reviewer was very clear from what I read, that the encounter did not happen. I think that very often there are lengthy discussions on the forum about how cold or unresponsive escorts are in the initial meeting, this does show a positive side to Xander that might help others make a decision on whether or not to contact him.

As was his very professional response to the "satisfactory" review he received. I feel that his response is further proof that perhaps he is more professional than the reviewer gave him credit for.

 

We all take different things from reviews. I personally took something very positive from this and I am always impressed when an escort responds positively to my initial contact. I just hired and escort for an upcoming trip. I will be spending a fair amount of money on this little 3 day jaunt. The escort was extremely friendly when he responded to my emails, and had he not responded as such, I might not have gone through with the plans. First contact to me is very important information to have.

 

 

I can appreciate what you are saying bvb and I don't disagree that there can be some value to feedback on initial contact. My only question, at least in my own mind, is what constitutes a review that can be posted on the site. If positive experiences with initial contact/correspondence but without an actual meeting is an acceptable criteria for a published review, then I should probably submit some reviews based on various experiences I have had recently. In the same context, negative experiences along the same lines should be valid as well. I just think it becomes a bit of a slippery slope. Just my opinion and in no way meant to be confrontational.

[bigvalboy]

Just my opinion and in no way meant to be confrontational.

 

Oh no no, not at all. I didn't look at your post like that, and besides,...I actually liked what you said, and I think without question that you have a valid point. That being said, Daddy does take all reviews VERY seriously, so if Daddy thought it was OK to post, then I am certainly good with that decision, and in that respect, I believe it fair game for anyone to comment on it as they see fit. Just to reiterate for a moment, I think that it is worth noting Xander's response to the satisfactory review, very professional I thought.

[Guest]

When I read reviews, I generally give much more weight to reviews written by established reviewers than to first-time reviewers. This is especially true when the first-timer reviews are scant on specifics, and more so when there are style similarities among the first-time reviews. It's also interesting to note that "buckguy" recently wrote in another thread (the one about Marc Dylan's first-timer "review"): " I had an experience not unlike the one that led to the recent negative review of Xander. Like a lot of younger guys in business (this one or otherwise), he needs to get a better idea of putting the business ahead of everything else. In contrast, gushing doesn't add much unless it's a rare experience in a client's reviews." I wonder if he (buckguy) ever wrote a review with his experience. I find it interesting that a client would be so moved by a contact which never happened to write his first review ever. That being said, I find the review being discussed in this string more plausible than others I've seen (not necessary likely, but plausible).