Austin - Rentboy Las Vegas

[Doe Be Doe]

Hello Anyone know Austin? His photos look like the model Tyler Lough. Thanks for any help!

 

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=299380

[Muscle Lover 2]

No, but I would like to. You have good tastes in men!

[+ Gar1eth]

You both have terrific taste- but my scam alert is pinging on this ad big time. I'd like to be wrong. But the pictures are too professional or something. Anyone in Vegas willing to see him to prove me wrong? I double, no, triple dog dare you!!!

 

Gman

[Epigonos]

Handsome face and very nice body and I rather like his ad. However, even if he isn't a scamer, at $300 an hour his price is more than I am EVER willing to pay.

[HoseMaster]

After looking at this guy's ad, and googling who Tyler Lough was, they are definitely the same person pictured. Unless Tyler is now escorting under the name "Austin", who knows what the escort looks like. Maybe he fell on some hard times, and it's really him! Take one for the team!

[Jaker27]

Actually it's 3 different people. Tyler Lough. The ass pic is Philip Fusco. The surf shorts are Andrei Vishnyakov.

 

http://gorgeousmen24.blogspot.com/2011/06/philip-fusco.html?zx=22018ef1a99bd436

[anotherjohnindupont]

You both have terrific taste- but my scam alert is pinging on this ad big time. I'd like to be wrong. But the pictures are too professional or something. Anyone in Vegas willing to see him to prove me wrong? I double, no, triple dog dare you!!!

 

Gman

 

There was a link about him a few weeks ago, but nobody could confirm nor deny his ad. I hope he's real, his picture reminds me of the pics of the gallery.

[+ Gar1eth]

Hello Anyone know Austin? His photos look like the model Tyler Lough. Thanks for any help!

 

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=299380

 

I don't think he looks much like Tyler Lough, but I find it difficult sometimes to match photos of models as they can look completely different depending on lighting, hair, etc.

 

I still think the ad is fake though.

 

Gman

[sincityboy2010]

If $300 is more than you are willing to pay than perhaps you should be checking out craiglist or find a street walking crack head. You get what you pay for.

[bigvalboy]

If $300 is more than you are willing to pay than perhaps you should be checking out craiglist or find a street walking crack head. You get what you pay for.

 

But sometimes with the "street walking crack heads" the 'crack' comes with the escort, so really it is two for one deal...

[Bosguy]

If $300 is more than you are willing to pay than perhaps you should be checking out craiglist or find a street walking crack head. You get what you pay for.

 

My feeling has always been that I prefer quality versus quantity in the professional guys that I spend time with and generally those guys will certainly ask a higher fee than Craigslist or other similar sites. This may not be everybody's approach but I have certainly met a few GREAT men this way

 

Boston Bill

[Frequentflier]

Are there $150 dollar per hour companions that provide great value, of course. Are there $300 per hour companions that don't, of course. Choosing off or RB or M4RN (or others) doesn't mean you or I are going to receive value for our hard earned money either. Doing due diligence, using common sense for setting up and during an encounter always pays off. I do think as well that if something is too good to be true (a seemingly amazing guy for $75 per hour) one should be very skeptical. Are there $300 per hour companions on crack, of course. Are there $300 per hour companions one would pay $500 for, I imagine there are. We can each probably think of an example of when we paid a lot and were pleased or when we paid a lot and was disappointed. I wonder if "you get what you pay for" has a specific historical foundation like "if you have to ask, you can't afford it" the latter of which refers to boat ownership and (I believe) was said by JP Morgan. There's also "a fool and his money are soon parted" which is I think an old proverb. Great reviews and reasonable cost = a full schedule (applies to any profession).

[+ Gar1eth]

If $300 is more than you are willing to pay than perhaps you should be checking out craiglist or find a street walking crack head. You get what you pay for.

 

Now Chris- that's not very nice. And not even accurate. I've been hiring a long time. And I can't think of many other things that have doubled their price in 10 years time- not even gasoline has risen as fast as escort prices. And continually raised prices may at some future tipping point cause a vicious cycle of decreasing clients necessitating an increase in rates further reducing client base.

 

Gman

[bigvalboy]

Now Chris- that's not very nice. And not even accurate. I've been hiring a long time. And I can't think of many other things that have doubled their price in 10 years time- not even gasoline has risen as fast as escort prices. And continually raised prices may at some future tipping point cause a vicious cycle of decreasing clients necessitating an increase in rates further reducing client base.

 

Gman

 

Actually Gman, I tend to disagree with you on that. OK we are getting a little off topic, my apologies to the OP, but gasoline prices have just about doubled in the last 10 years. Housing in LA, even in this recession is holding fairly well at "double digit" increase, and starting to see some solid gains. I would say that when I was working, my salary had easily doubled in the last 10 years. While escort prices may have easily doubled as well, no argument there, so have a lot of things in society. Escorts have to pay the same inflated prices for everything that you and I do. Housing, clothing, food, travel, transportation, insurance, health insurance costs, and all the other incidentals that we pay for on a daily basis. The list could easily fill this page.

 

I don't begrudge an escort for increasing his prices. The way I see it is that he does not have a paid retirement like many of us do, or able to collect social security, like many of us will be eligible to do. He most likely will not benefit either from a reduction in cost in a health plan that many of us will because of our employer. I currently pay pennies on the dollar, compared to friends of mine that do not have benefit of an employer supported plan. And his working years to save will not be as long as say many of us who are easily working well into our 60's and 70's.

 

Every single business in the country passes higher costs down to the consumer. We are consumers gentlemen, so it should not surprise you when an escort passes his higher costs down to us.

 

Would I pay 300 dollars an hour for an escort, absolutely, I have paid that and more. Does that Higher cost guarantee me a better experience, of course not, but I would never complain about the price. If I choose not to pay it, that is my prerogative and I just move on to the next guy. But I would say without reservation, that you underestimate the number of men out there who don't even hesitate at 300+ dollars per hour. Now back to Mr. Austin and Las Vegas...

[Epigonos]

I sincerely wish the old cliché “You get what you pay for” was true, unfortunately it isn’t. Were it true it would certainly make life much simpler. All of us, over age twenty, have had the experience of paying top dollar for something that turned out to be junk. This is the case whether we were buying a car, buying a refrigerator or, believe it or not, EVEN hiring an escort. The only thing that can “possibly” guarantee that we obtain value for our expenditure is research, Research, and more RESEARCH and even that isn’t foolproof.

 

I live in Southern California, one of the most expensive escort markets in the country. I have been hiring escorts for about ten years and am still doing so. During that period I have hired many of the biggest names in the industry and I have NEVER paid more than $250 an hour. I currently have two reviews waiting to be published. One of the reviews is of an unknown escort the other is of a very well know one. Both encounters were outstanding. In neither case did I pay more than $250 an hour. During my years of hiring I have spent time with dozens if not hundreds of escorts and have NEVER had the unfortunate experience of spending time with streetwalking junkies who I found on craigslist and I have NEVER paid more than $250 an hour.

 

Now if, as is indeed the case, I have had nothing but positive experiences in the Southern Californian market and have never paid more than $250 and hours I certainly wouldn’t expect to pay more in Austin. Austin is a great city but it certainly isn’t the epicenter of the escort market.

 

There are NO guarantees when it comes to hiring escorts but the best way to have a positive experience is NOT by paying $300 an hour or more. The best way to hire an escort is research, more research and even more research

[down_to_business]

On the escort named Austin serving Las Vegas, Nevada. I think its a fake, and if anyone is posting 3 different pictures of 3 different people as their own-- I wouldn't be interested in hiring them anyway.

 

As to $300 an hour. Personally, It isn't for me. I would guess escort Brody Sinclair who usually advertises at $700 - $1400 per hour would say the same thing about craigslist and crackheads to the $300 an hour escorts. Price and quality do not go hand in hand. I currently have 2 favorite escorts that I see. One charges $200 per hour the other charges me $250 for an overnight. One I learned about on men4rent and the other backpage. One has been reviewed and one hasn't. Neither advertise on rentmen or rentboy. Both are fantastic. Both blow the doors off any $300 experience I have had. Both also blow the doors off of any $100 experience I have had.

 

Rates are a subjective and controversial topic. The bottom line is, pay $100 an hour, pay $300 an hour, pay $1000 an hour. Hire guys that advertise on craigslist, backpage, men4rentnow or any other site, or that don't advertise at all. In the end it doesn't matter. What does matter is that you and your escort are good with whatever your escort is charging you, and that you have a good time. Quality is quality. A $25 bottle of wine can exceed a $100 bottle of wine in every way that matters. A $100 bottle of wine can also beat a $25 bottle of wine. You can read reviews about the wine. You can get recommendations from others about the wine. But in the end you don't really know which wine you will prefer until you taste it for yourself.

[seeker630]

If $300 is more than you are willing to pay than perhaps you should be checking out craiglist or find a street walking crack head. You get what you pay for.

 

Your remark seems insulting (which is surprising, considering your reputation) and, as others here have detailed, inaccurate in it's assumptions.

 

Rates also vary by location - no one local to my location could charge 300.

 

You're certainly free to charge what you think is appropriate, but it doesn't reflect well on you to put down those who might not be willing to pay your rates.

[Frequentflier]

Every single business in the country passes higher costs down to the consumer.

 

Except of course boatloads of businesses in the US that haven't been able to do this over the past say 7 years by way of example. Or maybe it wasn't the US you had in mind when you typed "country". Maybe there is another country where its mandated by law that everyone passes higher costs down to the consumer so suppliers can be assured of retaining their market share after raising prices? I know lawyers and lots of others that aren't charging today what they were 10 years ago. Or they charge $500 an hour and agree to a certain number of hours every month as complimentary. If there is insufficient demand, prices drop unless the seller just doesn't need the income. Prices too high and people don't buy, often times even if they have sufficient disposable income. And I totally agree with another posters comment that geography (aka competitive and economic environment) plays a big factor. I suspect time of month for the seller impacts the rate too - rent, payroll, food, insurance, etc. Do you think for every "money for nothing, chicks for free"/"all hat no cattle" wildcatter big spender there are 10 or some other multiple of guys who are all about and do pay a lower rate/keep an appointment/treat the guy well/call and pay again? Sometimes or periodically often higher rate means higher quality, sometimes higher rate just means less in the pocket afterwards. Its complicated - due diligence/reviews/instinct/etc.

[Frequentflier]

If $300 is more than you are willing to pay than perhaps you should be checking out craiglist or find a street walking crack head. You get what you pay for.

 

First, welcome! Nice to have you join us and although I'm sure you've never heard this before (haha), you are pleasing on the eyes It's also "be especially kind to escort (or companion as I refer to them) month" here so while you'll read contrary views to your statement about, your opinion is always welcome. I'm not opining here, just wanted to say please keep participating and never take offense when someone here disagrees. Many of us are working on our charm (me included) and so sometimes we're smooth when we argue/disagree and sometimes coarse as sandpaper. Probably can be said about every human except the guy in Rome that just resigned.

 

I have heard strong views expressed by companions before about their rates versus those that are less. And in my own business I've had customers say "but XYC company is 15% less". Sometimes its customary to haggle and sometimes not. Not every client knows that if a rate is posted for companionship, it's not customary or polite to haggle or bring up someone else's lower rate. Some companions who have had that experience therefore have strong views on the topic. In the auto industry the salesman would likely chuckle after you leave if you paid simply the sticker price off the window (while quickly counting the extra commission you just paid) and wouldn't be offended if you haggle. Its hard to know what's behind someone's opinion but I'll bet 99.9% of the time there's a story/experience that supports it and until we get to know someone or hear the support we're a bit (or a lot) clueless. When its possible for you to expand on a view you express, we'll appreciate it.

[bigvalboy]

Except of course boatloads of businesses in the US that haven't been able to do this over the past say 7 years by way of example. Or maybe it wasn't the US you had in mind when you typed "country". Maybe there is another country where its mandated by law that everyone passes higher costs down to the consumer so suppliers can be assured of retaining their market share after raising prices? I know lawyers and lots of others that aren't charging today what they were 10 years ago. Or they charge $500 an hour and agree to a certain number of hours every month as complimentary. If there is insufficient demand, prices drop unless the seller just doesn't need the income. Prices too high and people don't buy, often times even if they have sufficient disposable income. And I totally agree with another posters comment that geography (aka competitive and economic environment) plays a big factor. I suspect time of month for the seller impacts the rate too - rent, payroll, food, insurance, etc. Do you think for every "money for nothing, chicks for free"/"all hat no cattle" wildcatter big spender there are 10 or some other multiple of guys who are all about and do pay a lower rate/keep an appointment/treat the guy well/call and pay again? Sometimes or periodically often higher rate means higher quality, sometimes higher rate just means less in the pocket afterward. Its complicated - due diligence/reviews/instinct/etc.

 

Not to get into any lengthy debate over this, but I will say that I completely disagree with you. Are you saying that in the last 7 years cooperations and industry, gas, oil, manufacturing, food industry, airline industry etc. have all eaten the higher cost they have had to take on in transportation, distribution, fuel, warehousing, utilities, employee salaries, pensions, medical costs. Really? Unless I am not totally understanding what you are saying, which of course is possible, all those costs are passed down to the consumer. Companies close stores, lay off employees, cut back on hours, close factories all in an effort to reel in rising costs. No one absorbs those costs and just keep doing business as usual. The city of LA passed a whole string of cost increases, including increased cost on trash collection, traffic tickets, parking fees and property taxes. Fees on almost everything went up to cover their rising costs. Every time something happens in the gulf of Mexico and oil rigs go down, fuel prices spike, same for cold spells that affect crops, I mean the list and examples are endless.

 

As labor costs crept up, do you think that cooperations ate those increases and didn't do everything possible to increase their profits. I buried a family member not long ago. 3 years prior, she had arranged but not fully paid for the services. When we went in to finalize everything, we were told that the cost had risen 20% do you think that the funeral home ate that 20% just because of inflation...uh no.....OK I'll stop now...lol sorry for this little outburst. I just have to say, unless we are talking face to face it is difficult to have any sort of logical debate, which I think would in the end be very interesting...Cheers, BVB