Who would have thunk it?

[Guest fukamarine]

I have been meaning to post this for over a week now, but never seemed to get around to it. I'm surprised that some other member has not already done so.

 

In the Aug 30 - Sept 5 issue of TV guide, the cover story (complete with pictures) is about Travis Fimmel - CK's hunky underwear model and, if the stories we hear are true, an ex-escort from London.

 

Seems like he is about to become a TV star as the lead actor in a new series (being filmed in Toronto as we speak) called Tarzan. He claims he has been taking acting lessons for over two years but...... do we even care if he can act?

 

Thank God - there really is a Santa Clause!

 

fukamarine

[woodlawn]

There was a thread about Fimmel and his new series on the board months ago.

 

Is a television series starring a former underwear model really a cause for celebration? It's not as though there is a shortage of gay pornography, right? One can find naked pictures of men who work out a lot on a vast number of websites, so what's the big deal?

[+ glutes]

Was he a escort for men, or wo-men??

[VaHawk]

I agree, WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL?, but then again you have to consider the source of the observation.

 

Besides, from what I read, all of the action takes place in NYC, so the actor isn't going to be swinging on jungle vines wearing nothing but a loin cloth.

[marc anthony]

I gotta agree with the Canadian guy on this one... Travis Fimmel is one HOT guy. It will be fun to see him on commercials, promotions, shows, TV guide, and whatever other media opportunity this show will create for him to be more "exposed."

 

I mean that in both ways!

 

:9

[Flower]

> One can find naked

>pictures of men who work out a lot on a vast number of

>websites, so what's the big deal?

 

As usual, you and your sidekick take a light hearted post which is non-offensive to any reasonable person and try to make controversy with it. Your life must be truly boring. x(

 

I watch very little TV, however for for starters, instead of starting a new TV series with some big fat guy like on the King of Queens (title should have been saved for a gay series), they are staring some hot looking, cute guy to watch in a NON-porno series--but then maybe you and your shadow only watch porn--in which case I understand your indifference, but not your antagonism:+

[Uncle Bill]

I agree about looking forward to the promos. I had the same thoughts about Smallville when it premiered, and seeing that cute guy on billboards as I drove around always brightened my day.

[VaHawk]

> As usual, you and your sidekick take a

>light hearted post which is non-offensive to any reasonable

>person and try to make controversy with it. Your life must be

>truly boring. x(

>

No I DO BELIEVE you are the one trying to make a controversy. Why is it that anyone who doesn't agree with you, no matter how trivial the topic under discussion, has to be someone whose is life is boring, someone who needs to seek professional mental counseling, etc.? No one took fam's post as offensive, but IMO, you ARE DEFINITELY the most boring, offensive, all-knowing, totally condescending most useless excuse for a gay person that posts on this board!

 

Tell us all, have you EVER had a gay experience with another man that did not involve you paying for it? I'd bet not!

>

>I watch very little TV, however for for starters, instead of

>starting a new TV series with some big fat guy like on the

>King of Queens (title should have been saved for a gay

>series), they are staring some hot looking, cute guy to watch

>in a NON-porno series--but then maybe you and your shadow only

>watch porn--in which case I understand your indifference, but

>not your antagonism:+

>

>

Talk about typos. Where is dictionary.com that you live and die by? You are the most obnoxious person I have ever run across on the internet! It is perfectly okay for you to denigrate a TV show like King of Queens because it stars a man who is a "big fat guy"? How shallow, but then again I have to consider that the comment/critique comes from someone whose only identity with gay life comes from what the bills in his wallet can buy.

 

Yep, nothing makes a show's quality more than the fact the FABULOUS FUCKING FLOWER finds the guy physically hot! Nothing wrong with tooting the old horn for what you find is physically hot, but a hell of a lot wrong with you continually dismissing other's opinions as the rantings of mentally incapcitated, morally apprehensible, idiots because they disagree with your opinions.

 

All this holier than thou bullshit from someone who cheated on his wife with gay men because he didn't know "what I am?". Your intolerance towards others who don't share your opinions and views and whose experiences are way different than yours is GETTING REALLLY TIRESOME ASSHOLE! I would tell you stick your head up your ASS, but I think you were born with your head up your ass.

[Flower]

Whoa, big guy--you really have gone off the deep end on this one. If I hit a nerve about psychiatric counseling or being FAT, I really appolgize--I didn't realize you were so sensitive about those things

 

You need to chill a little hawk--deep breaths and relax man. Life is good and no need to become so frustrated that you start belittling yourself by calling names. After reading this post, I realize more than ever that if you had half a brain, you'd be dangerous :+

[woodlawn]

>> One can find naked

>>pictures of men who work out a lot on a vast number of

>>websites, so what's the big deal?

 

>As usual, you and your sidekick take a

>light hearted post which is non-offensive to any reasonable

>person and try to make controversy with it.

 

No one but you is trying to create a controversy, shit-for-brains. If you weren't such a filthy liar, you'd admit that my first post contains no personal attacks, while yours does.

 

Your life must be

>truly boring.

 

This from a small-time P.I. lawyer? LOL!

 

 

>I understand your indifference, but

>not your antagonism

 

I would be surprised to learn that you understand how to locate your own flabby behind. Twenty-five years ago and more the sources of eye candy for gay men in America were relatively few. Back then a television program starring someone like Fimmel might have been described as a rare pleasure. But these days? That clear it up for you, asshole?

[Flower]

As I said to your sidekick, "Whoa, big guy--you really have gone off the deep end on this one.

 

You need to chill a little woodie--deep breaths and relax man. Life is good and no need to become so frustrated that you start belittling yourself by calling names. I hate to repeat my self, but it is so appropriate for you also: "After reading this post, I realize more than ever that if you had half a brain, you'd be dangerous."

 

You guys are funny--almost like alter egos}( and when one of you jumps off the deep end the other is right behind. Maybe the BOBSY TWINS

 

http://www.3tprogram.org/Photos/Manitoba/Bobsytwins.jpg

 

However, if nothing else, you are entertaining :+

[Doug69]

>All this holier than thou bullshit from someone who cheated on

>his wife with gay men because he didn't know "what I am?".

 

Hey, Hawk, - thanks so much for this information about Flower. It explains so much about his grotesque being.

 

Those, like Flower, who are so desperate to publicly demonstrate what good, upstanding, pleasant, loving, moral souls they are - which is the exclusive objective of his never-ending, pious, fatally boring lectures here - have that desperate need precisely because they know what twisted, unhappy, untrustworthy, sad, lost, confused, malignant imbeciles they really are. The stronger the realization about themsleves, the greater the need to constantly demonstrate to others how nice and good they are.

 

Flower took some vow to his wife which he serially violated and deliberately disregarded because he no longer felt like adhereing to his commitments. He knows he did this, and until the day he dies, he will feel guilty and shameful about it, but he will also try so hard, so pitifully hard, to pretend otherwise.

 

That's what his character is - barren, amoral, untrustworthy, deceitful, selfish and betraying. That's why he's so eager to proclaim himself to be warm and nice and loving by attacking others here for being "confontational," "adversarial," etc. based on absoultely nothing. It's all about Flower's need for a public confessional and absoultion for his filthy behavior - it's all about his need to parade himself around in front of others as being a "good guy" -- and not at all about the targets of his impotent attacks. It's like a big thearpy couch for him here. So don't take it personally.

 

>Your intolerance towards others who don't share your opinions

>and views and whose experiences are way different than yours

>is GETTING REALLLY TIRESOME ASSHOLE!

 

True story: Before I posted a single post here to Flower, I seriously found him to be the most repulsive person I had ever encountered on any Internet message board. I couldn't put my finger on exaclty why that was, because I had only seen a few posts from him on seemingly innocuous topics. For awhile, I couldn't figure out if what sickened me most was the piousness combined with the petty-personal-injury-lawyer stupidity, or the pretense of being "laid-back and non-confronatational" compared with the reality of his being a bitter hater who can't stand dissent, or whehther it was the fact that everything he says is so trite and yet somehow still so appalling, etc.

 

Eventually, I stopped trying to figure out what was most vile about him, becasue no single attribute can be blamed. Rather, it's really the whole sickening package, the fact that, quite extraordinarily, he literally lacks even a single redeeming quality while exhibiting every wretched trait that makes a person intolerably putrid and worthless. I'm glad I figured it out, and I wanted to share my findings with others.

[Doug69]

>You need to chill a little woodie--deep breaths and relax man.

>Life is good and no need to become so frustrated that you

>start belittling yourself by calling names.

 

THIS - From the "Flower" bacteria who can barely write a single post that doesn't contain personal attacks and name-calling.

 

How dysfunctional, defective, and diseased must a person's brain be to sit in this forum writing post after post containing personal attacks and name-calling, only to then, IN THE SAME FORUM, constantly lecture others about the evils of personal insults and name-calling?

[+ deej]

>Was he a escort for men, or wo-men??

 

Well, first of all, it's all rumor.

 

There's another rumor that floats continually, though, that Calvin Klein only hires models who will put out for him. :9 It casts an interesting light on all those fabulous billboard models: Marcus Schenkenburg, Michael Bergin, Marky Mark ..... Travis Fimmell. }(

[taylorky]

>

>This from a small-time P.I. lawyer? LOL!

>

 

>

>

 

mucho money to be had in personnel injury litigation.

[woodlawn]

"Whoa, big

>guy--you really have gone off the deep end on this one.

 

Why -- because I replied to you with the same rancid insults you constantly use, you fucking hypocrite?

 

>You need to chill a little woodie

 

You need to go beg your wife's forgiveness for deceiving and betraying her. Is that what you said to her when she found out what you were doing behind her back -- "you need to chill, dear"? What is it really like to be a sociopath? I've always wondered.

 

>Life is good and no need to become so frustrated that you

>start belittling yourself by calling names.

 

Is that why you are constantly namecalling, because you're frustrated? Or is it just because you're a nasty old piece of shit?

 

I hate to repeat

>my self,

 

If you hate it, then I suppose the reason you keep doing it is that you can't think of anything new to say.

 

"After reading

>this post, I realize more than ever that if you had half a

>brain, you'd be dangerous."

 

But you are not dangerous -- fate has placed you in the kind of small time job where even someone as stupid as you are can't do too much harm. Thank goodness.

[Flower]

>No one but you is trying to create a controversy,

>shit-for-brains. If you weren't such a filthy liar, you'd

>admit that my first post contains no personal attacks, while

>yours does.

 

My my--such petty name calling--you are indeed frustrated. I read somewhere that people with lower than average IQ's express themselves this way since they are incapable of inteligent conversation and argument--but who knows

>This from a small-time P.I. lawyer? LOL!

 

Interesting comment from a school teacher.

 

Mind you, I have the greatest respect for teachers, but obviously you are suffering from burnout, which is too bad for the kids you are supposed to be teaching :-( It has to be more than burn out however, that makes you so bitter, but if name calling does it for you, have at it.

 

It is so hilarious that you and Hawk and Doug 69 are really the only posters here who resort to constant name calling--and you all flair up so easy--you guys are guaranteed entertainment :+

[Flower]

What do I do about my 3 yr old DOUGIE calling me names....

 

http://www.animationlibrary.com/Animation11/Jobs_and_People/Babies/Jumps_in_bed.gif

From:

http://pub75.ezboard.com/fgeoparentfrm20.showMessage?topicID=132.topic

 

What do I do about my 3 year old DOUGIE69 calling me names?? We don't allow our children to say things like "dumb, stupid etc." We make them find kinder words when they are angry, otherwise we get alot of name calling going on. Lately DOUGIE69 has been calling me alot of names. She calls me a "dummy, dummy, DUMMY head". When I tell her "that's not nice", she says "so, you're dumb". I've tried sending her to her room, time outs, screaming . I know alot of it is because of the baby, but we have done everything we can think of to make her feel special etc. Does she really just not like me?? Any advice would be great. Thanks.

 

Is it being said in a nasty way? Or is she playing with words?

 

Around the age of 3-4 kids love to start playing with words. One of these times they say something rude and it gets some attention. Then when they are in that niggly mood they they get in sometimes they decide to repeat what it was that made mum annoyed last time.

 

I found a good way if it is being done in a silly way is to say something silly, but not rude back. So when DOUGIE69 calls me a Bumhead I say, "well youre a jellyhead! Jelly head is funnier than Bumhead because Bum is a bathroom word isn't it darling?" Then I will quickly add in Smelly Jelly Felly head before he makes an issue out of Bum being a bathroom word. And I will talk about how its funny to say silly things sometimes if it isn't hurting anyones feelings.

 

If it is a deliberate attempt to be rude I will usually say, "Do you really think I am a bumhead, DOUGIE69? Because that hurts my feelings and doesn't make me feel very friendly towards you." I've never had a straight out "YES!" before, usually he will say no or say "Yes but only because you won't let me have some cake" Then DOUGIE69 and I just discuss the issue and tell him that he can tell me that he is mad, frustrated, lacks vocabulary, and has low self esteem without calling me names. (And no, DOUGIE69 doesn't get the cake. )

[Guest fukamarine]

>There was a thread about Fimmel and his new series on the

>board months ago.

>

>Is a television series starring a former underwear model

>really a cause for celebration? It's not as though there is a

>shortage of gay pornography, right? One can find naked

>pictures of men who work out a lot on a vast number of

>websites, so what's the big deal?

 

No Woodie - it's not a big deal - but it does titilate my imagination. After all, rumour does have it that he used to escort and that'd what this board is all about, right?

 

And this certainly isn't the first time one of us has made comment about a hunk on TV who seems to have lost his shirt permanently!

 

fukamarine

[Guest fukamarine]

>I agree, WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL?, but then again you have to

>consider the source of the observation.

 

You'll have to excuse my one dimentional mind, Halk. We can't all be multi faceted like you!

 

fukamarine

[Guest fukamarine]

>Well, first of all, it's all rumor.

 

True - but where there's smoke there's fire.

 

>There's another rumor that floats continually, though, that

>Calvin Klein only hires models who will put out for him. :9 It

>casts an interesting light on all those fabulous billboard

>models: Marcus Schenkenburg, Michael Bergin, Marky Mark .....

>Travis Fimmell. }(

 

I'd vote on it being true. Doesn't make the models gay but I would bet there are not too many models who would turn down the $$$ and fame that being a CK model would bring them, regardless of the entrance fee.

 

 

fukamarine

[Doug69]

I'm FLOWER'S WIFE - WHAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!! Help me!!!

 

HELP!!! I'm stuck at home, weeping and devestated and grieving, because my lying, deceitful husband, Flower, broke his vows and lied to me and left me and shattered my life with his selfish betrayal and chronic lying. This is me:

 

http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/eyetoeye/photolibrary/pix/90big.jpg

 

And, to make it so much worse, this lying pig actually has the audacity to run around the Internet lecturing other people and sermonizing them about how he is so good and just, while I sit at home imprisoned, lost, broken and smashed - my life ruined because of his lies and double life of deceit and selfish abandonment. Please join me in praying that he rots in hell because of what he has done to me and, worse, the way he holds himself out as the Beacon of Goodness and Love.

[woodlawn]

>My my--such petty name calling--you are indeed frustrated. I

>read somewhere that people with lower than average IQ's

>express themselves this way since

 

I read in Newsweek last month that people with lower than average IQ's can never remember where they read things. Is that true?

 

 

> they are incapable of

>inteligent conversation and argument--but who knows

 

You engage in namecalling at least as much as anyone else here, so I'd think you'd have no need to speculate about why people do it. Don't you know the reasons for your own actions?

 

 

>Interesting comment from a school

>teacher.

 

You know nothing about me, including my occupation. That isn't going to change. If your own wife couldn't trust you, how can I?

 

 

>Mind you, I have the greatest respect for teachers,

 

If so I'd think you'd have paid more attention in class and would not be making the stupid errors I often see in your posts.

 

>It is so hilarious that you and Hawk and Doug 69 are really

>the only posters here who resort to constant name calling

 

Why do you keep lying about your own namecalling? Do you really think anyone who even glances at this thread won't see plenty of examples in your posts?

 

 

--and

>you all flair up so easy--you guys are guaranteed

>entertainment

 

Speaking of stupid errors, were you busy playing with yourself when your teacher explained the difference between "flair" and "flare"?

 

I wish I could say that I find you entertaining. But I don't. In fact I am not entertained by men like you, who have done truly terrible things to other human beings and who come to this message board with the attitude that expressing sexual desire for other men is an excuse for just about anything.

 

Nor do I find it entertaining that you have the colossal nerve to lecture other people about their behavior when you have a history of betraying someone to whom you made a pledge of eternal loyalty. I can't even imagine what makes someone with your disgusting history think that you are fit to tell other people how to act. All I can say is that I think past generations acted hastily when they abolished the old custom of stoning people like you.

[woodlawn]

>No Woodie - it's not a big deal - but it does titilate my

>imagination. After all, rumour does have it that he used to

>escort and that'd what this board is all about, right?

 

Well, no. I thought this board was about providing information about people who DO escort so that the rest of us can decide whether to hire them. Be that as it may, I'll bite -- what's the source of the rumor?

 

 

>And this certainly isn't the first time one of us has made

>comment about a hunk on TV who seems to have lost his shirt

>permanently!

 

Sad, but true.

[VaHawk]

> Whoa, big guy--you really have gone off

>the deep end on this one. If I hit a nerve about psychiatric

>counseling or being FAT, I really appolgize--I didn't realize

>you were so sensitive about those things

>

>You need to chill a little hawk--deep breaths and relax man.

>Life is good and no need to become so frustrated that you

>start belittling yourself by calling names. After reading

>this post, I realize more than ever that if you had half a

>brain, you'd be dangerous :+

>

Your constant name calling and assumptions do not hit any nerve with me per the unique accusation, especially as far as pyschiatric counseling, FAT (which you assume must be the case with me, as you emphasize it with caps). This is what you did on this thread precisely for "entertainment" or whatever other reason your sick persona came up with.

 

What hits my nerve with you is your totally condescending attitude toward others who you feel are your inferiors either socially, professionally, intellectually, economically or morally, just because they express an opinion that is different than yours. When you can't refute other's opinions you pull out all the tired old cliches about "chilling", "psychiatric help", "frustration", "anger".

 

Everyone, but you oh mighty Flower, needs to chill and relax. Just another trite often repeated sentiment by you as you are so much better than everyone else, right? I may have only half a brain, but that gives me at least twice as much as you possess. Talk about a weak intellect look in the mirror, unless you are afraid doing so will shatter the glass, as when all else fails you, as a response to a post, you fall back on all the old cliches cited above.

 

Don't even try to refute the point that you are condescending, as the words of your posts say otherwise, no matter how much you pathetically and uselessy try to couch them with "not all", etc. As an example just look at this thread only in your totally nasty comments to woodlawn about being a teacher, but "not all teachers", right? just woodlawn being a burnout and a disservice to his students as if you knew woodlawn personally and you have ANY CLUE as to who/what woodlawn is/does.

 

Please forgive me for not shouting and "going over the deep end" by calling you more filthy names, as I hate to not entertain you.